Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Arizona

Springerville Generating Station

Springerville, AZ · ~327 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Springerville Generating Station runs at 160% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade D.

Springerville Generating Station: 1.9 TCR = 160% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Springerville Generating Station safety composite

Springerville Generating Station scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2019

Springerville Generating Station injury rate improved

Springerville Generating Station's TCR fell 1.3 from 3.1 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Springerville, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 1.9 · 160% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #9/13
  • PHOTO Magic Valley Generat…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~327 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Magic Valley Generating Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Springerville Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Springerville Generating Station averages 1.9 TCR (160% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Springerville Generating Station TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=1.8 · BLS 1.2

Where Springerville Generating Station falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 13 Electric power generation, fos employers in Arizona.

Springerville Generating Station (327 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Springerville Generating Station
Springerville Generating Station (327 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Springerville Generating Station has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.8 0.9 6 0 0
2018 1.9 0.9 6 0 0
2017 0.8 0.8 3 0 0
2016 3.1 1.7 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · AZ · Springerville

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 9 employers in Springerville, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Magic Valley Generating Station 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NCPA Combustion Turbine 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR A.S. King Plant 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SHAWVILLE GENERATING STATION 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1474 327 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2671 327 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yuma County Sheriff's Office 327 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenix Headquarters 327 FTE
CITY-NEAR Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest 423 FTE
CITY-NEAR White Mountain Regional Medical Center 189 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6400-SWY-0017-0017-02076 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWY-0017-0017-02076 FAC-02076-SPRINGERVILLE-AZ 91 FTE
NAT-TCR JK Products & Services 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Camblin Steel Service, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR North Chicago Plant 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Centennial High School 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Whitehall Facility 327 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chi St Vincent North 327 FTE
NAT-SIZE Markey's Rental & Staging 327 FTE
NAT-SIZE 095-01 Maria's Holding Corporation 327 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.