Cylinders, pressure, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing · Wisconsin

SPVG Tomahawk

Tomahawk, WI · ~92 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SPVG Tomahawk runs at 171% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cylinders, pressure, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

SPVG Tomahawk: 5.6 TCR = 171% of Cylinders, pressure, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SPVG Tomahawk safety composite

SPVG Tomahawk scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.0

2016→2024

SPVG Tomahawk injury rate improved

SPVG Tomahawk's TCR fell 7.0 from 9.2 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.2 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=4.4 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332420 · Tomahawk, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 171% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/18
  • PHOTO Highland Tank & Manu…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~92 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Highland Tank & Manufacturing Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

SPVG Tomahawk in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SPVG Tomahawk averages 5.6 TCR (171% of the Cylinders, pressure, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SPVG Tomahawk TCR series: 2016=9.2 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=4.4 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where SPVG Tomahawk falls in its industry

355 Cylinders, pressure, heavy gau establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 18 Cylinders, pressure, heavy gau employers in Wisconsin.

SPVG Tomahawk (92 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate SPVG Tomahawk
SPVG Tomahawk (92 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.6

SPVG Tomahawk has more employees than the Cylinders, pressure, heavy gauge metal, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 0.0 2 0 0
2023 4.4 1.5 3 0 0
2022 6.5 2.6 5 0 0
2021 6.4 3.8 3 2 0
2020 5.3 2.6 4 0 0
2019 5.2 2.6 4 0 0
2018 7.7 5.1 6 0 0
2017 3.9 1.3 3 0 0
2016 9.2 7.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332420 · WI · Tomahawk

355 Cylinders, pressure, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 18 employers in Tomahawk, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Highland Tank & Manufacturing Company 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR KBK Industries, LLC Liberal 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Steel Tank and Fabricating Corporation 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Feldmeier Equipment Iowa 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE La Macchia Group, LLC 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Office 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE James Peterson Sons, Inc. 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kuhlman Incorporated 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR TOMAHAWK, WI 434 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tomahawk Operations - Somo Facility 255 FTE
CITY-NEAR Louisiana-Pacific Tomahawk 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tomahawk Operations - Kaphaem Facility 111 FTE
NAT-TCR PBI West Palm Beach Airport 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Mack Iron Works Company 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Draper Inc 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 118 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Corporate & Equipment Group 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Comfort Systems USA Cincinnati Mechanical 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE OFS Brands Plant 21 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE A.N. Webber, Inc. - Kankakee 92 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.