Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge · North Carolina

Sugarcreek Construction LLC

Charlotte, NC · ~120 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sugarcreek Construction LLC runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge workplace, earning a grade A.

Sugarcreek Construction LLC: 1.1 TCR = 39% of Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sugarcreek Construction LLC safety composite

Sugarcreek Construction LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2018→2019

Sugarcreek Construction LLC injury rate improved

Sugarcreek Construction LLC's TCR fell 2.2 from 2.2 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.2 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 39% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/120
  • PHOTO Corporate Building
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~120 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Corporate Building (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Sugarcreek Construction LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sugarcreek Construction LLC averages 1.1 TCR (39% of the Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sugarcreek Construction LLC TCR series: 2018=2.2 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Sugarcreek Construction LLC falls in its industry

4,078 Construction management, highw establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 120 Construction management, highw employers in North Carolina.

Sugarcreek Construction LLC (120 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Sugarcreek Construction LLC
Sugarcreek Construction LLC (120 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Sugarcreek Construction LLC has more employees than the Construction management, highway, road, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.2 2.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · NC · Charlotte

4,078 Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Corporate Building 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR KNIVE RIVER - SALEM DIVISION 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR M A Beech Corporation 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coastal Contractors, LLC 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lumbee River EMC 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Carolina Department of Adult Correction Central Engineering 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glover Construction Co. 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huntley Brothers Co. Inc. 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Morgan Advanced Materials Thermal Ceramics Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Alpha Construction Co. Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Walsh & Kelly, Inc. - Corporate 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR SKC Communication Products LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE San Saba Pecan, LP 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valley Joist East 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sante' of North Scottsdale 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blackrock Logistics Fontana 120 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.