Fruit sorting, grading, and packing · California

Sun Pacific Shippers | Exeter Packinghouse

Exeter, CA · ~164 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sun Pacific Shippers | Exeter Packinghouse runs at 195% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fruit sorting, grading, and packing workplace, earning a grade D.

Sun Pacific Shippers | Exeter Packinghouse: 8.8 TCR = 195% of Fruit sorting, grading, and packing BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sun Pacific Shippers | Exeter Packinghouse safety composite

Sun Pacific Shippers | Exeter Packinghouse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sun Pacific Shippers | Exeter Packinghouse: 9.7 → 11.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 11.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.33× in 2024

Sun Pacific Shippers | Exeter Packinghouse's TCR rose 2.0 from 9.7 in 2018 to 11.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115114 · Exeter, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.8 · 195% of ind

  • DART 11.7 DART
  • RANK #183/236
  • PHOTO INDHEMP
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 104 inj
  • SIZE ~164 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: INDHEMP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sun Pacific Shippers | Exeter Packinghouse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sun Pacific Shippers | Exeter Packinghouse averages 8.8 TCR (195% of the Fruit sorting, grading, and packing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sun Pacific Shippers | Exeter Packinghouse TCR series: 2018=9.7 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=9.5 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=8.2 · 2023=9.8 · 2024=11.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Sun Pacific Shippers | Exeter Packinghouse falls in its industry

666 Fruit sorting, grading, and pa establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #183 safest of 236 Fruit sorting, grading, and pa employers in California.

Sun Pacific Shippers | Exeter Packinghouse (164 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sun Pacific Shippers | Exeter Packinghouse
Sun Pacific Shippers | Exeter Packinghouse (164 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sun Pacific Shippers | Exeter Packinghouse has more employees than the Fruit sorting, grading, and packing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.7 11.7 16 0 0
2023 9.8 8.0 16 0 0
2022 8.2 5.0 13 0 0
2021 6.4 5.2 10 1 0
2020 9.5 7.0 18 1 0
2019 6.2 4.4 13 1 0
2018 9.7 7.6 18 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115114 · CA · Exeter

666 Fruit sorting, grading, and packing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 26 employers in Exeter, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR INDHEMP 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Babcock, WI Receiving Station 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walters Produce Inc. 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stemilt Growers, LLC. - Olds Station 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cottonwood 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE GloriAnn Farms Brawley 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Coast Packing, Inc. 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE Faith Farming, LP 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gutierrez FLC Inc 1,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Exeter - F031 330 FTE
CITY-NEAR farm labor 218 FTE
CITY-NEAR CENTRAL CALIFORNIA BAKING CO 214 FTE
NAT-TCR Jifram 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR New Haven 088 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Manufacturing 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Des Moines 137 8.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hill's Pet Nutrition Inc., Bowling Green Facility 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allen 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE State's Attorney's Office 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE AJ Johns 164 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.