Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) · California

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30274)

Roseville, CA · ~152 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30274) runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) workplace, earning a grade B.

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30274): 2.8 TCR = 73% of Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30274) safety composite

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30274) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2022→2023

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30274) injury rate improved

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30274)'s TCR fell 1.6 from 3.6 in 2022 to 2.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.6 · 2023=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Roseville, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.8 · 73% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #107/387
  • PHOTO Mecklenburg County J…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~152 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mecklenburg County Jail Central (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30274) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30274) averages 2.8 TCR (73% of the Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30274) TCR series: 2022=3.6 · 2023=2 · BLS 3.8

Where Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30274) falls in its industry

2,836 Offices of Physicians (except establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #107 safest of 387 Offices of Physicians (except employers in California.

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30274) (152 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30274)
Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30274) (152 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30274) has more employees than the Offices of Physicians (except Mental Hea median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.0 1.0 2 0 0
2022 3.6 2.7 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · CA · Roseville

2,836 Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 311 employers in Roseville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mecklenburg County Jail Central 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Campbell Clinic - Med Center Clinic 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Pacific Medical Foundation (272-DAV) 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 284 Pulaski Road 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE LangeTwins Inc. 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sorrento Berry Farms, LLC - Lompoc 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE MT. VIEW PRODUCTION 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE MATEOS LABOR SERVICE INC. 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121801 4,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30003) 4,383 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02621801 3,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5001) 3,162 FTE
NAT-TCR US Tower Services, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Seaboard Energy of Oklahoma, LLC 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Premier Press 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Barnes Aerospace Lansing Division 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stratasys (SMACS) 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Life Care Center of Sparta 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prysmian Group Schuylkill Haven 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Denton DC #086 152 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.