Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Utah

The Coventry at Cottonwood Heights II

Salt Lake City, UT · ~95 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Coventry at Cottonwood Heights II runs at 173% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Coventry at Cottonwood Heights II: 6.6 TCR = 173% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Coventry at Cottonwood Heights II safety composite

The Coventry at Cottonwood Heights II scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Coventry at Cottonwood Heights II: 3.7 → 9.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 9.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.82× in 2019

The Coventry at Cottonwood Heights II's TCR rose 5.8 from 3.7 in 2016 to 9.5 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Salt Lake City, UT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 173% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #17/34
  • PHOTO The Claiborne at Ade…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Claiborne at Adelaide (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

The Coventry at Cottonwood Heights II in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Coventry at Cottonwood Heights II averages 6.6 TCR (173% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Coventry at Cottonwood Heights II TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2019=9.5 · BLS 3.8

Where The Coventry at Cottonwood Heights II falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 34 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Utah.

The Coventry at Cottonwood Heights II (95 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Coventry at Cottonwood Heights II
The Coventry at Cottonwood Heights II (95 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Coventry at Cottonwood Heights II has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 9.5 5.4 7 0 0
2016 3.7 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · UT · Salt Lake City

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 998 employers in Salt Lake City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Claiborne at Adelaide 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silver Creek Inn 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LEGACY HOUSE OF BOUNTIFUL 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Leisure Care Village at Unity 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CENTRAL VALLEY WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Utah Tile and Roofing Inc. 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE iFit Smithfield Production Facility 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Go-2 Fulfillment 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - SLC 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PC - Primary Childrens Hospital 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Technologies, Inc. 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salt Lake City Terminal 2,766 FTE
NAT-TCR GLC Brookview 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri-State Envelope Corporation 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR AMEREN MISSOURI - Berkeley District 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4546 Port Hueneme, C 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Meadow Burke - Fort Worth MFG 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bay Shippers LLC 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation Cecil Commerce Center (3321) 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ancra Group : ANCRA Erlanger 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.