Retirement communities, continuing care · Ohio

The Forum at Knightsbridge

Columbus, OH · ~218 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Forum at Knightsbridge runs at 216% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade F.

The Forum at Knightsbridge: 8.2 TCR = 216% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Forum at Knightsbridge safety composite

The Forum at Knightsbridge scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Forum at Knightsbridge: 2.9 → 10.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 55.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.49× in 2024

The Forum at Knightsbridge's TCR rose 7.5 from 2.9 in 2017 to 10.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 55.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Columbus, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.2 · 216% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #168/234
  • PHOTO Aston Gardens At Par…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~218 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aston Gardens At Parkland Commons (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

The Forum at Knightsbridge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Forum at Knightsbridge averages 8.2 TCR (216% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Forum at Knightsbridge TCR series: 2017=2.9 · 2018=2.2 · 2022=55.3 · 2023=17.3 · 2024=10.4 · BLS 3.8

Where The Forum at Knightsbridge falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #168 safest of 234 Retirement communities, contin employers in Ohio.

The Forum at Knightsbridge (218 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Forum at Knightsbridge
The Forum at Knightsbridge (218 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Forum at Knightsbridge has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.4 4.0 13 0 0
2023 17.3 17.3 3 19 0
2022 55.3 55.3 3 68 0
2018 2.2 0.0 2 2 0
2017 2.9 1.2 3 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · OH · Columbus

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,500 employers in Columbus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aston Gardens At Parkland Commons 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PHS - Croixdale 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Terraces of Phoenix 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morning Pointe of Franklin TN 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE General Mills (Cincinnati) 218 FTE
STATE-SIZE UNITED DAIRY FARMERS PLANT AND OFFICE 218 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Horizons Baking Company 218 FTE
STATE-SIZE Freeport Press, Inc. 218 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital 13,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital Main Campus 10,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Methodist Hospital 9,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH1 5,057 FTE
NAT-TCR Daniels Sharpsmart Inc - Orlando 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR DJ Construction 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pihl, Inc. 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Community Resources Inc 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Albemarle High School 218 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baptist Health Deaconess Medical Group 218 FTE
NAT-SIZE OCSD Central Jail Complex 218 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yellowfin Yachts 218 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.