Community recreation programs, government · Illinois

The Grove National Historic Landmark

Glenview, IL · ~52 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Grove National Historic Landmark runs at 353% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Community recreation programs, government workplace, earning a grade F.

The Grove National Historic Landmark: 11.3 TCR = 353% of Community recreation programs, government BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Grove National Historic Landmark safety composite

The Grove National Historic Landmark scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.0

2017→2018

The Grove National Historic Landmark injury rate improved

The Grove National Historic Landmark's TCR fell 15.0 from 18.8 in 2017 to 3.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 18.8 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=18.8 · 2018=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Glenview, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.3 · 353% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #56/63
  • PHOTO City Of Meriden Par…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City Of Meriden Park & Rec (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

The Grove National Historic Landmark in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Grove National Historic Landmark averages 11.3 TCR (353% of the Community recreation programs, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Grove National Historic Landmark TCR series: 2017=18.8 · 2018=3.8 · BLS 3.2

Where The Grove National Historic Landmark falls in its industry

413 Community recreation programs, establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 63 Community recreation programs, employers in Illinois.

The Grove National Historic Landmark (52 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Grove National Historic Landmark
The Grove National Historic Landmark (52 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

The Grove National Historic Landmark has fewer employees than the Community recreation programs, governmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 18.8 0.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · IL · Glenview

413 Community recreation programs, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 101 employers in Glenview, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City Of Meriden Park & Rec 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Phoenix E70 Parks&Rec 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Natural Resources (25) 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Griffith Park Boys Camp 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Curative Health Cultivation LLC 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2502-Ashton, IL (Monsanto Co.) 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sauget 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1240-Monmouth, IL (Monsanto Co.) 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Abt Electronics 1,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR GLENBROOK HOSPITAL 1,272 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glenview Community School District 34611110 843 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1366 GLENVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT #34 771 FTE
NAT-TCR Supervalu Distribution Center - Billings 32311 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 6836-HAR 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 3311 Capital Boulevard 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 220 Patchogue, Ny 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Logistec USA Inc 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE AW of Dexter 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jerusalen Home Ambulance Inc 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Jordan Plastics South Haven Facility 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.