Recreational programs administration, government · Arizona

City of Phoenix E70 Parks&Rec

Phoenix, AZ · ~716 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Phoenix E70 Parks&Rec runs at 352% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Recreational programs administration, government workplace, earning a grade F.

City of Phoenix E70 Parks&Rec: 11.3 TCR = 352% of Recreational programs administration, government BLS 3.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Phoenix E70 Parks&Rec safety composite

City of Phoenix E70 Parks&Rec scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

City of Phoenix E70 Parks&Rec: 11.2 → 12.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 12.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.17× in 2024

City of Phoenix E70 Parks&Rec's TCR rose 1.2 from 11.2 in 2016 to 12.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.3 · 352% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #19/20
  • PHOTO Dept. of Natural Res…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 645 inj
  • SIZE ~716 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dept. of Natural Resources (25) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

City of Phoenix E70 Parks&Rec in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Phoenix E70 Parks&Rec averages 11.3 TCR (352% of the Recreational programs administration, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

City of Phoenix E70 Parks&Rec TCR series: 2016=11.2 · 2017=11.7 · 2018=11.1 · 2019=11.1 · 2020=12.3 · 2021=11.9 · 2022=9.2 · 2023=10.5 · 2024=12.4 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Phoenix E70 Parks&Rec falls in its industry

413 Recreational programs administ establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 20 Recreational programs administ employers in Arizona.

City of Phoenix E70 Parks&Rec (716 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Phoenix E70 Parks&Rec
City of Phoenix E70 Parks&Rec (716 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

City of Phoenix E70 Parks&Rec has more employees than the Recreational programs administration, go median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.4 1.9 84 1 0
2023 10.5 0.8 66 4 0
2022 9.2 0.8 51 7 0
2021 11.9 0.9 73 2 0
2020 12.3 1.0 82 1 0
2019 11.1 0.5 68 4 0
2018 11.1 2.6 73 0 0
2017 11.7 2.0 76 2 0
2016 11.2 6.1 72 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · AZ · Phoenix

413 Recreational programs administration, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Natural Resources (25) 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR City Of Meriden Park & Rec 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Grove National Historic Landmark 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR West region HQ construction 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mops Bridgecrest 716 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tucson Fire Department 717 FTE
STATE-SIZE Havasu Regional Medical Center 712 FTE
STATE-SIZE Christian Care Management Inc 722 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Owens-Illinois, Inc. Plant 76 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Amber Court of Elizabeth 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hall Ambulance Service, Inc. 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Vic Firth / Avedis Zildjian Company 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - IND5 716 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kilgore Industries, LP 716 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heartland Community College 716 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenpoint Service Center-Ny50 716 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.