Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · South Carolina

The Haven in the Summit

Columbia, SC · ~42 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Haven in the Summit runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

The Haven in the Summit: 3.0 TCR = 79% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Haven in the Summit safety composite

The Haven in the Summit scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Haven in the Summit: 2.4 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.15× in 2019

The Haven in the Summit's TCR rose 1.1 from 2.4 in 2017 to 3.5 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Columbia, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 79% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #17/107
  • PHOTO CELEBRATION VILLA OF…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CELEBRATION VILLA OF TEAYS VALLEY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

The Haven in the Summit in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Haven in the Summit averages 3.0 TCR (79% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Haven in the Summit TCR series: 2017=2.4 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=3.5 · BLS 3.8

Where The Haven in the Summit falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 107 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

The Haven in the Summit (42 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Haven in the Summit
The Haven in the Summit (42 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Haven in the Summit has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2018 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 2.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SC · Columbia

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 542 employers in Columbia, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CELEBRATION VILLA OF TEAYS VALLEY 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63173 SUNRISE OF HAVERFORD 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Merrill Gardens at Glen Mills 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Cypress Lake 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Titan Production Company, LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newberry Electric Cooperative,Inc. 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spartanburg Resource Center PNG 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE DRB Group South Carolina, LLC- Charleston Division 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Health Richland 5,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prisma Health Richland 4,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Carolina Department of Transportation 4,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC Department of Transportation 3,864 FTE
NAT-TCR FedEx Supply Chain - Hrtz Plainfield 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AMB180 Seattle 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 4054-Abs 0004 0067 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Plexus Manufacturing Solutions - Appleton 2 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Joel Kennedy Constructing Corp. 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sharp Energy - Georgetown 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Falmouth 12528 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lightwave Facility - 01 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.