Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

The Village at Heritage Park

Natomas, CA · ~74 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Village at Heritage Park runs at 370% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Village at Heritage Park: 14.1 TCR = 370% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Village at Heritage Park safety composite

The Village at Heritage Park scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Village at Heritage Park: 0.0 → 9.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 29.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2022

The Village at Heritage Park's TCR rose 9.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 9.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 29.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Natomas, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.1 · 370% of ind

  • DART 9.3 DART
  • RANK #488/635
  • PHOTO WEL-Life at Spirit L…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WEL-Life at Spirit Lake (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

The Village at Heritage Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Village at Heritage Park averages 14.1 TCR (370% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Village at Heritage Park TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=24 · 2019=29.7 · 2020=19.1 · 2021=16.3 · 2022=9.3 · BLS 3.8

Where The Village at Heritage Park falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #488 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

The Village at Heritage Park (74 employees, TCR 14.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Village at Heritage Park
The Village at Heritage Park (74 employees, TCR 14.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Village at Heritage Park has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 9.3 9.3 5 0 0
2021 16.3 16.3 10 0 0
2020 19.1 6.3 12 0 0
2019 29.7 11.1 12 4 0
2018 24.0 4.0 10 2 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Natomas

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WEL-Life at Spirit Lake 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kenton Pointe Assisted Living 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paramount Senior Living at Middleburg Heights 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atria Roseland 14.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wonderful Orchards-New Columbia 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Apricot Lane Farms 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central California Almond Growers (Kerman) 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jose Jesus Garcia Jr 74 FTE
NAT-TCR 217955-Shv-Southfield Sta 14.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 381755-Col-Eastland Carrier Anx 14.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Northglenn Heights 14.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 242567-Falmouth Po 14.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE City Attorney 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fox Run Elementary 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3495-10D8131 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kreider Farms - Manheim Egg 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.