Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Arizona

Triumph Group Precision Components-Phoenix

Chandler, AZ · ~81 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Triumph Group Precision Components-Phoenix runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Triumph Group Precision Components-Phoenix: 2.0 TCR = 60% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Triumph Group Precision Components-Phoenix safety composite

Triumph Group Precision Components-Phoenix scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Triumph Group Precision Components-Phoenix: 1.4 → 2.2 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.55× in 2018

Triumph Group Precision Components-Phoenix's TCR rose 0.8 from 1.4 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.4 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Chandler, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 60% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #14/25
  • PHOTO Northrop Grumman Sys…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation - ASBU Clearfield (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Triumph Group Precision Components-Phoenix in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Triumph Group Precision Components-Phoenix averages 2.0 TCR (60% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Triumph Group Precision Components-Phoenix TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Triumph Group Precision Components-Phoenix falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 25 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Arizona.

Triumph Group Precision Components-Phoenix (81 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Triumph Group Precision Components-Phoenix
Triumph Group Precision Components-Phoenix (81 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Triumph Group Precision Components-Phoenix has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.2 1.1 2 0 0
2017 2.4 2.4 1 1 0
2016 1.4 1.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · AZ · Chandler

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 462 employers in Chandler, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation - ASBU Clearfield 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ILC Dover 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Systems : Sterling, VA 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phoenix DC 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Carrot Plant 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ocotillo Powerplant 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE M. R. Tanner Construction 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE THREE PHASE ELECTRIC, LLC 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chandler Campus 6,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocotillo Campus 5,428 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030510 3,265 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030510-510001 2,446 FTE
NAT-TCR 207 Bristol 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ineos Abs USA LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Plainville Community Schools Plainville High School 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR C&J Cladding 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE FF44436 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flint St. Plant 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverbend Assisted Living Community 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Legends - Gorge Amphitheatre 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.