Water distribution (except irrigation) · Oregon

Tualatin Valley Water District-HQ

Beaverton, OR · ~129 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tualatin Valley Water District-HQ runs at 262% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water distribution (except irrigation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Tualatin Valley Water District-HQ: 3.1 TCR = 262% of Water distribution (except irrigation) BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tualatin Valley Water District-HQ safety composite

Tualatin Valley Water District-HQ scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tualatin Valley Water District-HQ: 2.8 → 4.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.15× in 2022

Tualatin Valley Water District-HQ's TCR rose 1.7 from 2.8 in 2016 to 4.5 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Beaverton, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 3.1 · 262% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #6/18
  • PHOTO H2O innovation Opera…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~129 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: H2O innovation Operation & Maintenance LLC - O&M Houston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Tualatin Valley Water District-HQ in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tualatin Valley Water District-HQ averages 3.1 TCR (262% of the Water distribution (except irrigation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tualatin Valley Water District-HQ TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=3.7 · 2022=4.5 · BLS 1.2

Where Tualatin Valley Water District-HQ falls in its industry

727 Water distribution (except irr establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 18 Water distribution (except irr employers in Oregon.

Tualatin Valley Water District-HQ (129 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Tualatin Valley Water District-HQ
Tualatin Valley Water District-HQ (129 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Tualatin Valley Water District-HQ has more employees than the Water distribution (except irrigation) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.5 3.6 5 0 0
2021 3.7 1.9 2 2 0
2020 2.5 1.6 3 0 0
2019 2.6 0.9 3 0 0
2018 2.8 0.0 2 1 0
2016 2.8 1.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · OR · Beaverton

727 Water distribution (except irrigation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 240 employers in Beaverton, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR H2O innovation Operation & Maintenance LLC - O&M Houston 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Lates Water Authority- Southwest Water Treatment Plant 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgefield County Water and Sewer Authority 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evoqua Water Technologies, LLC - New Castle 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Andersen Construction Company, LLC Portland 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hunter-Davisson, Inc. 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacific Surimi 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE CBI 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nike World Headquarters 14,796 FTE
CITY-NEAR 004-Nike Air Manufacturing Oregon 1,585 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tailwind (IHM - Beaverton) 1,170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Analog Devices 907 FTE
NAT-TCR Lippert Bros., Inc 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bethany Resort Furnishings 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Miklos Air Conditioning 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Taylor Forge Stainless, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Advanced Energy Industries - Milpitas 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Murphy Tower Service LLC 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clarion Boards LLC 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Utility LLC 129 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.