Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Wisconsin

Upland Point Corporation

Mineral Point, WI · ~59 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Upland Point Corporation runs at 122% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Upland Point Corporation: 4.6 TCR = 122% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Upland Point Corporation safety composite

Upland Point Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.0

2016→2020

Upland Point Corporation injury rate improved

Upland Point Corporation's TCR fell 12.0 from 12.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.0 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Mineral Point, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 122% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #92/273
  • PHOTO Chateau of Batesville
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chateau of Batesville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Upland Point Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Upland Point Corporation averages 4.6 TCR (122% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Upland Point Corporation TCR series: 2016=12 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Upland Point Corporation falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #92 safest of 273 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Upland Point Corporation (59 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Upland Point Corporation
Upland Point Corporation (59 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Upland Point Corporation has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 4.4 0.0 2 0 0
2017 4.3 2.1 2 0 0
2016 12.0 0.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WI · Mineral Point

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 12 employers in Mineral Point, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chateau of Batesville 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Discovery Villages At Palm Beach Gardens 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Montgomery Gardens 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Perspective Carlson Parkway 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Insight FS - Antigo 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Burlington Service Center 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northland Buildings Inc 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE NCC Fond du Lac 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cummins Emissions Solutions 607 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cummins Emission Solutions 492 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sielaff Corporation 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mineral Point Health Services 44 FTE
NAT-TCR Heritage Hall West 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Farm Labor Services 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Country Mart #2443 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer Store 128 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE R.E. Dye Manufacturing Corporation 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cooperativa Ahorro Y Credito Aguada 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2253-H4023 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prent Corporation- Puerto Rico 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.