Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Rhode Island

Mount St. Rita Health Centre

Cumberland, RI · ~105 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mount St. Rita Health Centre runs at 173% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade D.

Mount St. Rita Health Centre: 11.3 TCR = 173% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mount St. Rita Health Centre safety composite

Mount St. Rita Health Centre scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mount St. Rita Health Centre: 3.3 → 6.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 37.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.61× in 2024

Mount St. Rita Health Centre's TCR rose 3.6 from 3.3 in 2016 to 6.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 37.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Cumberland, RI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 11.3 · 173% of ind

  • DART 6.9 DART
  • RANK #64/86
  • PHOTO Autumn Care
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 62 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Autumn Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Rhode Island employers → · Look up another →

Mount St. Rita Health Centre in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mount St. Rita Health Centre averages 11.3 TCR (173% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mount St. Rita Health Centre TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=5.9 · 2018=0.2 · 2020=37.4 · 2021=11.3 · 2022=18.3 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=6.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Mount St. Rita Health Centre falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Rhode Island alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #64 safest of 86 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Rhode Island.

Mount St. Rita Health Centre (105 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mount St. Rita Health Centre
Mount St. Rita Health Centre (105 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Mount St. Rita Health Centre has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.9 6.9 5 0 0
2023 6.8 6.8 4 0 0
2022 18.3 14.1 13 0 0
2021 11.3 9.9 8 0 0
2020 37.4 34.7 5 22 0
2018 0.2 0.0 19 0 0
2017 5.9 5.9 5 0 0
2016 3.3 3.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · RI · Cumberland

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,610 rated employers in Rhode Island with headcount on file · 55 employers in Cumberland, RI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Autumn Care 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Newaygo Medical Care Facility 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Miller's Merry Manor- Wabash East 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jefferson 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Daniele International - DPI 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Narragansett 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lockheed Window Corp. 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE High Purity New England 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tiffany & Co. - FHF Site 619 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tiffany and Company 603 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brookdale Cumberland 424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Martin Street 232 FTE
NAT-TCR Vic Firth / Avedis Zildjian Company 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Amber Court of Elizabeth 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Owens-Illinois, Inc. Plant 76 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Phoenix E70 Parks&Rec 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Minnesota 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bristol Village, Inc. 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE B18 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Newport Utilities 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.