Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses on chassis of own manufacture · North Carolina

Volvo Trucks NA Greensboro

Greensboro, NC · ~1,892 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Volvo Trucks NA Greensboro runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses on chassis of own manufacture workplace, earning a grade A.

Volvo Trucks NA Greensboro: 0.4 TCR = 13% of Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses on chassis of own manufacture BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Volvo Trucks NA Greensboro safety composite

Volvo Trucks NA Greensboro scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Volvo Trucks NA Greensboro held a steady TCR band

Volvo Trucks NA Greensboro's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.5 in 2016 to 0.5 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.5 · 2017=0.3 · 2018=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336120 · Greensboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #1/9
  • PHOTO PACCAR Inc - Corporate
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~1,892 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PACCAR Inc - Corporate (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Volvo Trucks NA Greensboro in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Volvo Trucks NA Greensboro averages 0.4 TCR (13% of the Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses on chassis of own manufacture BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Volvo Trucks NA Greensboro TCR series: 2016=0.5 · 2017=0.3 · 2018=0.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Volvo Trucks NA Greensboro falls in its industry

124 Assembly plants, heavy trucks, establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 9 Assembly plants, heavy trucks, employers in North Carolina.

Volvo Trucks NA Greensboro (1,892 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 223 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Volvo Trucks NA Greensboro
Volvo Trucks NA Greensboro (1,892 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 223 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Volvo Trucks NA Greensboro has more employees than the Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.5 0.3 11 0 0
2017 0.3 0.1 6 0 0
2016 0.5 0.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336120 · NC · Greensboro

124 Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses on chassis of own manufacture employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PACCAR Inc - Corporate 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Customer Service and Training 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nikola Corporation 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Global Technology Center 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Biltmore Workforce Management 1,894 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4795-PS-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-PSAA 1,876 FTE
STATE-SIZE Matthew Warren Inc. 1,874 FTE
STATE-SIZE AWNC 1,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR Corporate Office 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Aratana Therapeutics Kansas location 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Barton Campus 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR R/W Connection, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Elkhart Community Schools 1,892 FTE
NAT-SIZE Conti, LLC 1,892 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - LEX2 1,891 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dot Foods, Inc.- MTS Dot 1,890 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.