Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Waterford at College Station

College Station, TX · ~34 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Waterford at College Station runs at 238% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Waterford at College Station: 9.0 TCR = 238% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Waterford at College Station safety composite

Waterford at College Station scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−27.1

2019→2024

Waterford at College Station injury rate improved

Waterford at College Station's TCR fell 27.1 from 27.1 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 27.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=27.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · College Station, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.0 · 238% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #321/470
  • PHOTO New Horizon Lodge
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: New Horizon Lodge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Waterford at College Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Waterford at College Station averages 9.0 TCR (238% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Waterford at College Station TCR series: 2019=27.1 · 2021=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Waterford at College Station falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #321 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Waterford at College Station (34 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Waterford at College Station
Waterford at College Station (34 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Waterford at College Station has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 27.1 5.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · College Station

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 149 employers in College Station, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR New Horizon Lodge 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dardenne Prairie MC Care Properties, LLC 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brentwood at Fore Ranch 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ivy Park at Sabre Springs 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE SOUTHWEST FEED YARD 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Tulia 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pineywoods 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE TXP 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - College Station 1,289 FTE
CITY-NEAR College Station Office 991 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scott & White Hospital - College Station 819 FTE
CITY-NEAR College Station,TX 725 FTE
NAT-TCR 2603 Tul68 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sokol and Company 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Soho House Chicago,LLC 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Handforge 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cruisin' Community Transit Connection, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Cabinets Counters, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gingerich Construction Co. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE C.G.R. Construction Co. Inc. 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.