Print shops, flexographic (except printing books) · Ohio

WS Packaging Group, Inc - Mason/WSA

Mason, OH · ~173 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

WS Packaging Group, Inc - Mason/WSA runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Print shops, flexographic (except printing books) workplace, earning a grade D.

WS Packaging Group, Inc - Mason/WSA: 4.3 TCR = 129% of Print shops, flexographic (except printing books) BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

WS Packaging Group, Inc - Mason/WSA safety composite

WS Packaging Group, Inc - Mason/WSA scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2016→2018

WS Packaging Group, Inc - Mason/WSA injury rate improved

WS Packaging Group, Inc - Mason/WSA's TCR fell 4.9 from 6.5 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.5 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Mason, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 129% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #120/138
  • PHOTO Commercial Printers,…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~173 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Commercial Printers, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

WS Packaging Group, Inc - Mason/WSA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows WS Packaging Group, Inc - Mason/WSA averages 4.3 TCR (129% of the Print shops, flexographic (except printing books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

WS Packaging Group, Inc - Mason/WSA TCR series: 2016=6.5 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where WS Packaging Group, Inc - Mason/WSA falls in its industry

2,001 Print shops, flexographic (exc establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #120 safest of 138 Print shops, flexographic (exc employers in Ohio.

WS Packaging Group, Inc - Mason/WSA (173 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate WS Packaging Group, Inc - Mason/WSA
WS Packaging Group, Inc - Mason/WSA (173 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

WS Packaging Group, Inc - Mason/WSA has more employees than the Print shops, flexographic (except printi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.6 0.5 3 0 0
2017 4.8 1.2 8 0 0
2016 6.5 4.1 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · OH · Mason

2,001 Print shops, flexographic (except printing books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 159 employers in Mason, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Commercial Printers, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CSG Fort Worth DDC 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Japs Olson - St Louis Park 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lamar Facility 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shelly Northwest construction 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weidmann Electrical Technology Inc. 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE ArcelorMittal Warren (EIN 043634649) 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henkel - Cleveland 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Intelligrated Systems, LLC, dba Honeywell Intelligrated and its successors 1,036 FTE
CITY-NEAR Intelligrated Systems LLC - Installations 966 FTE
CITY-NEAR HQ & FIELD 915 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics 892 FTE
NAT-TCR Distinctive Doors Inc 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Compassionate Care Hospice of Scranton 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Shopko Hometown #686 (Glenwood, IA) 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Globe Manufacturing Company, LLC 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Samet Corporation 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sabert RDC 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE 100179 - Kamehameha Guideway 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glenburnie Rehabilitation & Nursing Center 173 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.