Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · Arizona

Yamaichi Electronics USA, Inc-AZ

Chandler, AZ · ~51 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Yamaichi Electronics USA, Inc-AZ runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Yamaichi Electronics USA, Inc-AZ: 0.8 TCR = 25% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Yamaichi Electronics USA, Inc-AZ safety composite

Yamaichi Electronics USA, Inc-AZ scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Yamaichi Electronics USA, Inc-AZ: 0.0 → 3.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.0 TCR · DART/TCR 3.74× in 2023

Yamaichi Electronics USA, Inc-AZ's TCR rose 3.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 3.0 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 3.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · Chandler, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 25% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #3/7
  • PHOTO Sienna Corporation
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sienna Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Yamaichi Electronics USA, Inc-AZ in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Yamaichi Electronics USA, Inc-AZ averages 0.8 TCR (25% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Yamaichi Electronics USA, Inc-AZ TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=3 · BLS 3.3

Where Yamaichi Electronics USA, Inc-AZ falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 7 Connectors, electronic (e.g., employers in Arizona.

Yamaichi Electronics USA, Inc-AZ (51 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Yamaichi Electronics USA, Inc-AZ
Yamaichi Electronics USA, Inc-AZ (51 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Yamaichi Electronics USA, Inc-AZ has fewer employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · AZ · Chandler

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 462 employers in Chandler, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sienna Corporation 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR BIRNS, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCB Piezotronics 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smiths Interconnect Kansas City 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Salubrious Wellness Clinic Inc 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mission Citrus 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar Multi-Family - AZ (SW) 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE PSHIA T4-S1 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chandler Campus 6,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocotillo Campus 5,428 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030510 3,265 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030510-510001 2,446 FTE
NAT-TCR Lighting Services Inc 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR PSE&G NJ Projects & Construction 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #1751 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lane Pipeline Construction, LLC. 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Micron Metalworks, LLC 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mkg of Dublin 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woolpert- Atlanta 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mkg of Christiansburg Ii 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.