Industry profile · NAICS 522220

Automobile Finance and leasing

Workplace injury rates across 38 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

38
Employers
0.9
Avg TCR
0.5
BLS benchmark
76
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Automobile Finance and leasing average 0.9 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.8 times the BLS national benchmark of 0.5.

0.9
avg TCR · reporting employers
0.5
BLS national benchmark
38
employers reporting
76
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Automobile Finance and leasing Safety Data Reveals

The Automobile Finance and leasing sector (NAICS 522220) encompasses 38 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 76 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 0.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 0.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 0.9 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Automobile Finance and leasing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 1
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Warren WARREN, MI F 4.2
Seattle LYNNWOOD, WA F 2.8
DOPS Bridgecrest FORT WORTH, TX F 2.6
Gwinett ALPHARETTA, GA F 1.3
First Western Equipment Finance EDEN PRAIRIE, MN F 1.3
Transwest_BR 29 DENVER, CO F 1.3
FL Branch MAITLAND, FL D 0.9
Sugarland SUGARLAND, TX D 0.8
CA Branch IRVINE, CA D 0.8
CNAC WI101 BROOKFIELD, WI D 0.8
Mops Bridgecrest MESA, AZ C 0.4
Mobile Call Center MOBILE, AL B 0.4
VA Branch CHESAPEAKE, VA A 0.2
Detroit IO DETROIT, MI A 0.2
AOC II ARLINGTON, TX A 0.2
NEXTGEAR CAPITAL CARMEL, IN A 0.2
NV Branch LAS VEGAS, NV A 0.1
St. Louis Call Center EARTH CITY, MO A 0.1
SA Operations Center SAN ANTONIO, TX A 0.1
AOC I ARLINGTON, TX A 0.1
Corporate Burnett FORT WORTH, TX A 0.0
IL Branch LOMBARD, IL C 0.0
ABC ARLINGTON, TX C 0.0
AOC III ARLINGTON, TX C 0.0
Denver GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO C 0.0
DFW Branch ARLINGTON, TX C 0.0
Orlando LAKE MARY, FL C 0.0
Horsham PA branch HORSHAM, PA C 0.0
So Cal CERRITOS, CA C 0.0
Milwuakee BROOKFIELD, WI C 0.0
Boston WESTBOROUGH, MA C 0.0
CNAC KALAMAZOO, MI C 0.0
BetterBuilt Storage, LLC GREENVILLE, SC C 0.0
HZ CNAC Inc KALAMAZOO, MI C 0.0
CNAC BROOKFIELD, WI C 0.0
DEAL SHIELD ATLANTA, GA C 0.0
Crossroads Equipment Lease and Financing WHITTIER, CA C 0.0
Bobcat - 02 JACKSONVILLE, FL C 0.0
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Automobile Finance and leasing?

This sector averages 0.9 against a BLS benchmark of 0.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.