Industry profile · NAICS 333922

Belt conveyor systems manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 411 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

411
Employers
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
6,022
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Belt conveyor systems manufacturing average 4.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.3 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

4.3
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
411
employers reporting
6,022
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Belt conveyor systems manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Belt conveyor systems manufacturing sector (NAICS 333922) encompasses 411 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 6,022 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.3 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Belt conveyor systems manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 7 of 9
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Amazon Robotics BOS- 27 Westborough, MA A 1.2
Magnum Systems, Inc. - Jothi Parsons, KS A 1.2
Siemens Logistics LLC Dfw Airport, TX A 1.2
Lauyans & Co on Chestnut Louisville, KY A 1.2
Honeywell Hamilton Parts Distribution Center Hamilton, OH A 1.2
Industrial Maintenance of Topeka Inc Topeka, KS A 1.2
Arch Environmental Equipment Inc Paducah, KY A 1.2
Richwood Industries Huntington, WV A 1.2
Honeywell Intelligrated - Danville Danville, KY A 1.2
Garvey Corporation Blue Anchor, NJ A 1.1
Honeywell Intelligrated - London London, OH A 1.1
Vanderlande Industries Marietta, GA A 1.1
Daifuku Wynright Corporation Hobart, IN A 1.1
Dorner Mfg Hartland, WI A 1.1
Jessup Systems Rochester Hills, MI A 1.1
3001 Grand Rapids, MI A 1.1
Bastian Mobile Robotics Dallas, TX A 1.1
Usti-Tn (Hq) Portland, TN A 1.0
Adaptec Solutions, Painted Post Painted Post, NY A 1.0
Innovative Handling Sylvania, OH A 1.0
Integrated Solutions Memphis, TN A 1.0
Adaptec Solutions, Memphis Memphis, TN A 1.0
Horizon PSI Lawrence, KS A 1.0
Birko Corporation - Equipment Division Olathe, KS A 0.9
Central Conveyor Wixom Wixom, MI A 0.9
Dematic - Modernizations and Upgrades Grand Rapids, MI A 0.9
Trew, LLC Fairfield, OH A 0.9
Grenzebach Corporation Newnan, GA A 0.8
Bastian Autonomous Vehicles Georgetown, KY A 0.8
Lear Corporation - Sparta Sparta, MI A 0.8
Honeywell Intelligrated Olivette, MO A 0.8
Honeywell Intelligrated WC OH0L West Chester, OH A 0.8
Honeywell Intelligrated - West Chester OH West Chester, OH A 0.8
Pro-Fab LLC Springdale, AR A 0.8
Bastian Engineering Sales Indianapolis, IN A 0.8
FlexLink Systems Inc. Allentown, PA A 0.7
Honeywell Intelligrated - USS (MD85) Owings Mills, MD A 0.7
MHSE - Bowling Green Bowling Green, KY A 0.7
Amazon Robotics BOS12 North Reading, MA A 0.7
Michigan Office Novi, MI A 0.7
Honeywell Intelligrated - MD82 Frederick, MD A 0.6
Amazon Robotics BOS13 Westborough, MA A 0.6
Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. Lino Lakes, MN A 0.6
B.W. Sinclair, Inc. Wichita Falls, TX A 0.5
Pride Conveyance Systems: A Roeslein Company Hollister, CA A 0.5
Frantz Manufacturing Sterling, IL A 0.5
Southern Systems International, LLC Memphis, TN A 0.5
EMI Corp- Wickliffe Wickliffe, OH A 0.4
FWM Mechanical Inc. Minden, LA A 0.4
MHSC Norton Shores, MI A 0.4
← Prev Page 7 of 9 Next →

Safety grades are a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA and BLS data, not an official OSHA rating. Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Related

All industries → | Rankings →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Belt conveyor systems manufacturing?

This sector averages 4.3 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.