Industry profile · NAICS 238290

Commercial-type door installation

Workplace injury rates across 1,325 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,325
Employers
2.9
Avg TCR
2.8
BLS benchmark
9,178
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Commercial-type door installation average 2.9 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.0 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.8.

2.9
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.8
BLS national benchmark
1,325
employers reporting
9,178
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Commercial-type door installation Safety Data Reveals

The Commercial-type door installation sector (NAICS 238290) encompasses 1,325 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 9,178 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.8 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.9 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Commercial-type door installation that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 9 of 27
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
D46 Salt Lake City Salt Lake City, UT C 2.8
The Liberty Auto and Electric Company Bridgeport, CT C 2.8
Grain Flo, Inc Heyworth, IL C 2.8
Lenoir Site Lenoir, NC C 2.7
Vortex Colorado - FTW Fort Worth, TX C 2.7
Overhead Door Co of Akron Cuyahoga Falls, OH C 2.7
American Door and Dock, Inc. Schaumburg, IL C 2.7
Airways Door Service East Syracuse, NY C 2.7
Petroleum Marketers Eq Co of Tulsa LLC Tulsa, OK C 2.7
TK Elevator Omaha Omaha, NE C 2.7
Headquarters Springfield, NJ C 2.7
Overhead Door Company of Albuquerque Albuquerque, NM C 2.7
Cross Technologies Inc Nissan Canton Canton, MS C 2.7
520-Naples Bonita Springs, FL C 2.7
Kiner Inc. Aurora, NE C 2.7
Byram MS Byram, MS C 2.7
Bonded Lightning Protection Systems, Ltd. Argyle, TX C 2.7
Otis Elevator Company-Des Moines Urbandale, IA C 2.7
Southwestern Industrial Contractors and Riggers, Inc El Paso, TX C 2.6
D12 Madison Madison, WI C 2.6
Hales and Associates, Inc. Main Office Greensboro, NC C 2.6
D18 Indianapolis Indianapolis, IN C 2.6
DuraFlex Wooster, OH C 2.6
Valley View Agri Jonesboro, AR C 2.6
D15 Chicago Downtown Chicago, IL C 2.6
040-Peoria Peoria, IL C 2.6
Vortex Colorado - SDN Centennial, CO C 2.6
MEI Wisconsin Menomonee Falls, WI C 2.6
190-Detroit Livonia, MI C 2.6
TK Elevator Columbus Westerville, OH C 2.6
Diebold Nixdorf Cranberry Twp PA Cranberry Township, PA C 2.6
TK Elevator Long Island Islandia, NY C 2.6
Airdraulics Inc North Hollywood, CA C 2.6
DH Pace Company, Inc. dba Pinnacle Door Bloomington, IL C 2.6
TK Elevator Washington DC College Park, MD C 2.6
Otis Elevator Company-Tulsa Tulsa, OK C 2.6
Diebold Nixdorf Cranbury NJ Cranbury, NJ C 2.5
Thermal West Industrial North Salt Lake, UT C 2.5
H & H Door - Victoria Victoria, TX C 2.5
Total Construction Solutions Co-1 Davenport, IA C 2.5
Precision Insulation, Inc. Sacramento, CA C 2.5
Diebold Nixdorf Hamilton OH Hamilton, OH C 2.5
260-Grand Rapids Wyoming, MI C 2.5
TK Elevator Orlando Orlando, FL C 2.5
TK Elevator Fort Myers Fort Myers, FL C 2.5
Interstate Erecting Inc Oak Creek, WI C 2.5
TK Elevator Eagle Gypsum, CO C 2.5
TK Elevator Midland Midland, TX C 2.5
thyssenkrupp Elevator Corp Northern New Jersey Cranford, NJ C 2.5
TK Elevator Greer Greer, SC C 2.5
← Prev Page 9 of 27 Next →

Safety grades are a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA and BLS data, not an official OSHA rating. Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Related

All industries → | Rankings →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Commercial-type door installation?

This sector averages 2.9 against a BLS benchmark of 2.8 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.