Industry profile · NAICS 236210

Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses)

Workplace injury rates across 1,163 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,163
Employers
3.1
Avg TCR
2.9
BLS benchmark
9,765
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) average 3.1 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.1 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.9.

3.1
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.9
BLS national benchmark
1,163
employers reporting
9,765
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) Safety Data Reveals

The Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) sector (NAICS 236210) encompasses 1,163 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 9,765 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.1 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.9 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.1 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 25 of 25
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
GEM Industrial Inc. - Nutrien (Potash PCS), Lima Lima, OH C 0.0
Wollam Construction Sandy, UT C 0.0
Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC Job #31040 Houston, TX C 0.0
Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC Job #31059 Corpus Christi, TX C 0.0
Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC Job #31794 Bishop, TX C 0.0
Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC Job #31818 Pasadena, TX C 0.0
Mundy Support Services LLC Job #34327 Baytown, TX C 0.0
Mundy Maintenance, Services and Operations LLC Job #32003 Victoria, TX C 0.0
Mundy Support Services LLC Job #34855 Pasadena, TX C 0.0
Mundy Support Services LLC #31075 Houston, TX C 0.0
Mundy Support Services LLC Job #34331 Baytown, TX C 0.0
Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC Job #31465 Houston, TX C 0.0
Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC Job #31032 Galena Park, TX C 0.0
Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC Job #31045 Fayetteville, NC C 0.0
Mundy Maintenance, Services and Operations LLC Job #32807 Seaford, DE C 0.0
Mundy Maintenance, Services and Operations LLC Job #32378 Lugoff, SC C 0.0
Project PGT Ellisville, MS C 0.0
Nelson Engineering Inc. Sioux Falls, SD C 0.0
Mundy Maintenance, Services and Operations LLC Job #32384 Waynesboro, VA C 0.0
Mundy Maintenance, Services and Operations LLC Job #32420 Fayetteville, NC C 0.0
Innova Global Inc Denver, CO C 0.0
Field St Louis, MO C 0.0
The Austin Co. Atlanta Atlanta, GA C 0.0
Trade Facility Services Pittsburgh, PA C 0.0
103459 - Nestle Hereford Wet Food Can Exp Hereford, TX C 0.0
Alproem Engineering Contractors Corp/Pfizer Guayama Guayama, PR C 0.0
Reaction Construction Corporation Queensbury, NY C 0.0
JFSNA at NALCO Freeport Freeport, TX C 0.0
JFSNA at NALCO Fresno Houston, TX C 0.0
192158 Plant Barry Units 4&5 Bucks, AL C 0.0
JFSNA at ADM Peoria Peoria, IL C 0.0
JFSNA at ADM Cedar Rapids Cedar Rapids, IA C 0.0
Hunter Site Services, LLC Deer Park, TX C 0.0
Jacobs BIA-Tampa Airport-FL Tampa, FL C 0.0
MS - Annapolis Junction, MD - 1AJMD Annapolis Junction, MD C 0.0
MS - Annapolis Junction, MD - 1ANMD Annapolis Junction, MD C 0.0
7421-Ineos Chocolate Bayou Alvin, TX C 0.0
8104-Dow St. Charles Hahnville, LA C 0.0
Donley's LLC Richmond, VA C 0.0
thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. - Atlanta Atlanta, GA C 0.0
thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. - Bridgeville Bridgeville, PA C 0.0
IFCo Project Wever, IA C 0.0
CCI Construction Services, LLC Redstone Arsenal, AL C 0.0
Caliber Services, LP Clute, TX C 0.0
TEC Industrial Maintenance & Construction (Eastman Division) Kingsport, TN C 0.0
Jacobs BIA-NG Melbourne-FL Melbourne, FL C 0.0
Jacobs-BIA-BJC Campus-MO St. Louis, MO C 0.0
MasTec Industrial Power Centennial, CO C 0.0
← Prev Page 25 of 25
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses)?

This sector averages 3.1 against a BLS benchmark of 2.9 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.