Industry profile · NAICS 236210

Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses)

Workplace injury rates across 1,163 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,163
Employers
3.1
Avg TCR
2.9
BLS benchmark
9,765
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) average 3.1 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.1 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.9.

3.1
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.9
BLS national benchmark
1,163
employers reporting
9,765
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) Safety Data Reveals

The Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) sector (NAICS 236210) encompasses 1,163 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 9,765 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.1 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.9 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.1 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 9 of 25
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
GCI Gladbrook Gladbrook, IA B 2.0
Bilfinger Midwest Regional Cape Girardeau, MO B 2.0
Systematics Screen Printing Itasca, IL B 2.0
F-E Contracting, Inc. Palmer, AK B 2.0
Tuttle Construction Lima, OH B 2.0
GreenWood, Inc.- Caterpiller Bogart, GA B 2.0
UFP-Mid Atlantic LLC Locust, NC B 2.0
Corden Pharma Boulder Boulder, CO B 2.0
Schaaf Window Co Inc Tinley Park, IL B 1.9
RDA Services Company Citronelle, AL B 1.9
Thompson Construction Group Inc Caterpillar Pin Sumter, SC B 1.9
Heartland Construction Inc. Chesapeake, VA B 1.9
Fitts & Goodwin, Inc. West Columbia, SC B 1.9
Sma, LLC Monticello, MN B 1.9
Deacon Construction, LLC - CA Citrus Heights, CA B 1.9
Commercial Contracting Services Keokuk, IA B 1.9
Taylor Bros. Construction Co., Inc. Columbus, IN B 1.9
Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC Job #31047 Durham, NC B 1.9
Plymouth Engineered Shapes Hopkinsville, KY B 1.9
Martco Construction LLC Oakdale, LA B 1.9
Lanxess Charleston, SC B 1.9
R&R Erectors Inc dba S&H Erectors Hixson, TN B 1.8
Construction Solutions & Consulting, LLC Sedalia, MO B 1.8
CR Meyer - Oshkosh Oshkosh, WI B 1.8
CR Meyer - Tulsa Tulsa, OK B 1.8
Great Day Improvements Macedonia, OH B 1.8
CAM Industrial Solutions @ Suncor Commerce City Commerce City, CO B 1.8
8778/4631-Moss Point Fabrication Moss Point, MS B 1.8
John F. Otto Inc. Sacramento, CA B 1.8
Santa Cruz Nutrionals Sumter, SC B 1.8
Astec - Sterling Sterling, IL B 1.8
SDB Tempe Tempe, AZ B 1.8
AES Clean Technology Montgomeryville, PA B 1.8
Fab Shop Sumter, SC B 1.8
Jinko Solar Jacksonville, FL B 1.8
CR Meyer and Sons Co. Oshkosh, WI B 1.8
JC Curtis Construction Co., LLC Chattanooga, TN B 1.8
Fitts and Goodwin, Inc. West Columbia, SC B 1.8
194793 Loggerhead Solar Port St. Lucie, FL B 1.8
Comco Systems INC Lake Dallas, TX B 1.8
8393-Bayer Muscatine Muscatine, IA B 1.8
Shingobee Builders, Inc. Loretto, MN B 1.7
BnK Construction Inc. Gladstone, OR B 1.7
TRI Construction Co Boston, MA B 1.7
Level It Installations Ltd. San Francisco, CA B 1.7
The Renaissance Companies Scottsdale, AZ B 1.7
Avis Construction Company Roanoke, VA B 1.7
NXP Chandler, AZ B 1.7
Bill Lorrigan Construction, Inc. Reedsville, WI B 1.7
8796/4633-Charlotte Fabrication Charlotte, NC B 1.7
← Prev Page 9 of 25 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses)?

This sector averages 3.1 against a BLS benchmark of 2.9 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.