Industry profile · NAICS 623311

Continuing care retirement communities

Workplace injury rates across 4,269 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

4,269
Employers
8.3
Avg TCR
3.8
BLS benchmark
81,354
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Continuing care retirement communities average 8.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 2.2 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.8.

8.3
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.8
BLS national benchmark
4,269
employers reporting
81,354
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Continuing care retirement communities Safety Data Reveals

The Continuing care retirement communities sector (NAICS 623311) encompasses 4,269 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 81,354 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 8.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.8 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 8.3 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Continuing care retirement communities that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 29 of 87
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
The Landings at Norcross Norcross, GA F 9.3
Morning Pointe of Russell Russell, KY F 9.3
SearStone-RLA, Inc Cary, NC F 9.2
5 Star Staffing Greensburg, PA F 9.2
Highland Path St Paul, MN F 9.2
Park Terrace Rancho Santa Margarita, CA F 9.2
American House - Ft Myers Ft Myers, FL F 9.2
Polar Ridge Senior Living North Saint Paul, MN F 9.2
Morton Place Nebraska City, NE F 9.2
Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society Moscow, ID F 9.2
Hawthorn Court Phoenix, AZ F 9.2
The Cliffs at Eagle Rock West Orange, NJ F 9.2
Marvella St Paul, MN F 9.2
Cherry Ridge Webster, NY F 9.2
Silverado Overland Park - 480 Overland Park, KS F 9.2
SpringRidge Wilsonville, OR F 9.2
Autumn House East York, PA F 9.2
Clepper Manor, CCRC - Sharon Sharon, PA F 9.2
Fox Run Village Novi, MI F 9.2
Sweet Galilee at the Wigwam Anderson, IN F 9.2
Arden Courts of Wayne Wayne, NJ F 9.2
Bayleigh Chase Easton, MD F 9.2
Chapel Ridge Bradford, PA F 9.2
Aventura at the Heights Baltimore, MD F 9.2
Eiler Place Clarinda, IA F 9.2
Sanctuary at the Oaks Muskegon, MI F 9.2
Hearth at Glastonbury Glastonbury, CT F 9.2
PHS - Woodland Hill Hudson, WI F 9.2
Belmont Village Calabasas Calabasas, CA F 9.2
Wyndemere Senior Living Wheaton, IL F 9.2
Vi at the Glen Glenview, IL F 9.2
Cadence at North Raleigh Raleigh, NC F 9.1
Bella Vista Asheville, NC F 9.1
Timber Ridge at Talus Issaquah, WA F 9.1
Primrose Retirement Community of Kokomo Kokomo, IN F 9.1
Villa of Wolfforth Wolfforth, TX F 9.1
Mt. Arlington Senior Living Mt. Arlington, NJ F 9.1
Silverado Bee Cave - 462 Bee Cave, TX F 9.1
Overland Park Place Overland Park, KS F 9.1
The Atrium Assisted Living Metairie, LA F 9.1
North Houston MC, LLC Houston, TX F 9.1
The Moorings Of Arlington Heights LLC Arlington Heights, IL F 9.1
Rose Tree Place Media, PA F 9.1
The Stratford Chapel Hill, NC F 9.1
Cedar Bay West West Bend, WI F 9.1
Brookdale Ocoee Ocoee, FL F 9.1
Leighton Place Williamsport, PA F 9.1
Southwest Florida Senior Housing,LLC Naples, FL F 9.1
Manor Care Health Services Summer Trace AL Carmel, IN F 9.1
6443-512105 Dorchester, MA F 9.1
← Prev Page 29 of 87 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Continuing care retirement communities?

This sector averages 8.3 against a BLS benchmark of 3.8 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.