Industry profile · NAICS 623311

Continuing care retirement communities

Workplace injury rates across 4,269 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

4,269
Employers
8.3
Avg TCR
3.8
BLS benchmark
81,354
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Continuing care retirement communities average 8.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 2.2 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.8.

8.3
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.8
BLS national benchmark
4,269
employers reporting
81,354
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Continuing care retirement communities Safety Data Reveals

The Continuing care retirement communities sector (NAICS 623311) encompasses 4,269 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 81,354 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 8.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.8 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 8.3 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Continuing care retirement communities that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 60 of 87
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Beatitudes Campus Phoenix, AZ D 4.7
Claremont Manor Claremont, CA D 4.7
Orchard Path Apple Valley, MN D 4.7
Indian Rock Village Fairfield Bay, AR D 4.7
The Fountains at Canterbury Oklahoma, OK D 4.7
Harvester Place Burr Ridge, IL D 4.7
Three Crowns Park Evanston, IL D 4.7
Sunscape Boca Raton Boca Raton, FL D 4.7
Baptist Home of South Jersey Riverton, NJ D 4.7
LindenGrove Communities LLC - New Berlin Court New Berlin, WI D 4.7
Arden Courts of Fair Oaks Fairfax, VA D 4.7
Regency at Puakea LLC Lihue, HI D 4.7
The Lodge Retirement Community Cincinnati, OH D 4.7
Findlay Retirement Community LLC dba Primrose of Findlay Findlay, OH D 4.7
The Reutlinger Community Danville, CA D 4.7
Craigside Retirement Residence Honolulu, HI D 4.7
Continental Austin, TX D 4.7
Westminster Presbyterian Center Inc Rock Hill, SC D 4.7
Arbutus Park Retirement Community Johnstown, PA D 4.6
LIFE Lancaster Lancaster, PA D 4.6
Linden Village Lebanon, PA D 4.6
Belmont Village Glenview Glenview, IL D 4.6
Southern Pines Retirement Southern Pines, NC D 4.6
Primrose Retirement Community of Decatur Decatur, IL D 4.6
Russ Place Ruston, LA D 4.6
Milestone Senior Living Hillsboro Hillsboro, WI D 4.6
Morton Grove Assisted Living Morton Grove, IL D 4.6
Brookdale Lakeway - SNF Lakeway, TX D 4.6
Regent Park Wichita, KS D 4.6
Friendship Village of Schaumburg Schaumburg, IL D 4.6
Jack Henry Arlington, LLC Arlington, TX D 4.6
The Watermark at Beverly Hills Beverly, CA D 4.6
Kendal at Ithaca Ithaca, NY D 4.6
Trinity Woods Tulsa, OK D 4.6
Sierra Point Roseville, CA D 4.6
Brandon Woods at Alvamar Lawrence, KS D 4.6
The Rio Grande Rio Rancho, NM D 4.6
Lancaster Bickford Lancaster, OH D 4.6
Rice Estate Columbia, SC D 4.6
The Windsor of Lakewood Ranch Lakewood Ranch, FL D 4.6
Arden Courts of South Holland South Holland, IL D 4.6
Arhc Whwchpa01 Trs, LLC West Chester, PA D 4.6
Silverado Kingwood - 220 Kingwood, TX D 4.6
Glacier Hills Senior Living Community-THSC Ann Arbor, MI D 4.6
Maravilla at the Domain Austin, TX C 4.6
Breeze Park Saint Charles, MO C 4.6
Arden Courts of Wilmington Wilmington, DE C 4.6
River Landing at Sandy Ridge Colfax, NC C 4.6
Rolling Meadows Place Scott Depot, WV C 4.6
The Sarah Community Bridgeton, MO C 4.6
← Prev Page 60 of 87 Next →

Safety grades are a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA and BLS data, not an official OSHA rating. Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Related

All industries → | Rankings →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Continuing care retirement communities?

This sector averages 8.3 against a BLS benchmark of 3.8 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.