Industry profile · NAICS 325199

Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 647 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

647
Employers
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
4,030
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing average 2.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

2.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
647
employers reporting
4,030
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing sector (NAICS 325199) encompasses 647 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 4,030 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.2 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 4 of 14
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Complex Chemical Co. Inc. Tallulah, LA B 2.6
APChem - Latexo Crockett, TX B 2.6
Cymer - Dayton Dayton, TN B 2.6
Borchers Americas Inc. Franklin Plant Franklin, PA B 2.5
TX200 Lufkin Chemical Lufkin, TX B 2.5
ACS Technical Products Griffith, IN B 2.5
Vertellus - Greensboro Greensboro, NC B 2.5
Ortec - Easley Easley, SC B 2.5
PMC Specialties Group Inc Cincinnati, OH B 2.5
Struktol Company of America (1) Stow, OH B 2.5
Shin-Etsu Silicones of America, Inc. Evans 1 Akron, OH B 2.5
IBC Advanced Technologies Inc. American Fork, UT B 2.5
ChemDesign Marinette, WI B 2.5
Hardy Industrial Technologies Painesville Township, OH B 2.5
Conway Bakelite Chemicals Conway, NC B 2.5
REG Grays Harbor, LLC Hoquiam, WA B 2.5
Valtris Specialty Chemcials-- Walton Hills Walton Hills, OH B 2.5
Economy Mud Products Company Houston, TX B 2.5
Baerlocher Production USA, LLC Cincinnati, OH B 2.5
Thermo Fisher Scientific (Milwaukee) LLC Milwaukee, WI B 2.4
Shin-Etsu Silicones of America, Inc. Damar Akron, OH B 2.4
allnex USA Inc - Kalamazoo Kalamazoo, MI B 2.4
Silbond Corporation Weston, MI B 2.4
Shin-Etsu Silicones of America, Inc. Evans 2 Akron, OH B 2.4
Manufacturers Chemicals Cleveland, TN B 2.4
MFG Kimberly Park Dalton, GA B 2.4
Purac America Inc. dba Corbion Blair, NE B 2.3
Optima Belle LLC Belle, WV B 2.3
Polyventive LLC D140 Calhoun, GA B 2.3
MilliporeSigma - DEKALB Saint Louis, MO B 2.3
Vanderbilt Chemicals, LLC Murray Division Murray, KY B 2.3
Checkerspot Berkeley Berkeley, CA B 2.3
SynQuest Laboratories Inc Alachua, FL B 2.3
Delta Energy LLC Natchez, MS B 2.3
DanChem Technologies, Inc Danville, VA B 2.3
SantoLubes Manufacturing LLC Spartanburg, SC B 2.3
Arch Chemicals Inc. Rochester, NY B 2.2
Aldrich Chemical Co., LLC - Sheboygan Sheboygan Falls, WI B 2.2
Evonik jayhawk fine chemicals corp. Galena, KS B 2.2
REG New Boston New Boston, TX B 2.2
World Energy Houston LLC Galena Park, TX B 2.2
LANXESS Corporation Bushy Park Goose Creek, SC B 2.2
Koppers Follansbee Follansbee, WV B 2.2
GEO Specialty Chemicals Allentown, PA B 2.2
Big Island Biodiesel Keaau, HI B 2.2
Struktol Company of America, LLC Stow, OH B 2.2
Pulcra Chemicals, LLC Rock Hill, SC B 2.1
Gelest Morrisville, PA B 2.1
3V Sigma USA INC Georgetown, SC B 2.1
Northern Region : Missoula Missoula, MT B 2.1
← Prev Page 4 of 14 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing?

This sector averages 2.2 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.