Industry profile · NAICS 333413

Fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 250 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

250
Employers
4.1
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
4,127
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing average 4.1 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.3 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

4.1
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
250
employers reporting
4,127
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing sector (NAICS 333413) encompasses 250 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 4,127 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.1 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.1 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 3 of 5
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Sauk Rapids Office Sauk Rapids, MN C 3.6
Henderson Engineering Co., Inc. Sandwich, IL C 3.6
Camfil - Corcoran (071) Corcoran, CA C 3.5
Filtration Group Joliet, IL C 3.4
AAF Flanders CSC Washington, NC C 3.4
NT Supply and NFS - Greenwood Greenwood, IN C 3.4
Accurex OK Tulsa, OK C 3.4
Accurex (KVS) NC Kings Mountain, NC C 3.4
Airmaster Fan Company Clarklake, MI C 3.3
Custom Filter LLC Aurora, IL C 3.3
The Spencer Turbine Company Windsor, CT C 3.3
Filtration Group LLC Santa Rosa, AP C 3.2
Central Illinois Manufacturing Company Bement, IL C 3.2
Ventamatic LTD Mineral Wells, TX C 3.2
RenewAire LLC Waunakee, WI C 3.2
PURE Humidifier Co. Chaska, MN C 3.1
Big Ass Fans-Indy Fortville, IN C 3.1
Aerospace Filtration Systems, Inc. Chesterfield, MO C 3.0
Twin City Fan Companies. Ltd. Eltkon Elkton, SD C 3.0
Ice Qube, Inc Greensburg, PA C 3.0
AirPro Fan & Blower co. -WEST Rhinelander, WI C 3.0
Camfil APC Jonesboro, AR C 3.0
Twin City Fan & BLower Brookings, SD C 3.0
AAF Flanders Hudson Hudson, NY C 2.9
AAF Flanders Atlanta Atlanta, GA C 2.9
Freudenberg Filtration Technologies (Filters Now) Saraland, Alabama Saraland, AL C 2.9
Trion IAQ Sanford, NC C 2.9
AAF Flanders Smithfield Smithfield, NC C 2.9
Dampers OK Tulsa, OK C 2.8
Filters Now, LLC Creola, AL C 2.8
AirPro Fan & Blower co. -NORTH Rhinelander, WI C 2.8
Air Flow Technology Inc Kenosha, WI C 2.8
McGill AirClean LLC Columbus, OH C 2.8
Freudenberg Filtration Technologies - Wellford, South Carolina Wellford, SC C 2.7
Twin City Fan Companies: Clarage Pulaski, TN C 2.7
2967-NY67 Woodstock, NY C 2.7
Air Quality Engineering, Inc. Brooklyn Park, MN B 2.6
TANN Corporation Kaukauna, WI B 2.6
Johnson Controls BE - KOCH Filter Houston TX - 13383 Houston, TX B 2.6
AAF Flanders Bartow Bartow, FL B 2.6
Camfil - Riverdale, NJ Riverdale, NJ B 2.6
Tempest Technology Corp. Fresno, CA B 2.6
Excel Dryer Inc East Longmeadow, MA B 2.5
Munters Corporation Lansing, MI B 2.5
Freudenberg Filtration Technologies (Filters Now) Creola, Alabama Creola, AL B 2.5
Morrison Products Dallas Mesquite, TX B 2.5
Process Barron Field Service Pelham, AL B 2.5
Howden Americas Medina, OH B 2.5
Koch Filter Houston, TX B 2.5
DCM Manufacturing - TX Grand Prairie, TX B 2.4
← Prev Page 3 of 5 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing?

This sector averages 4.1 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.