Industry profile · NAICS 326199

Fiberglass Pool Manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 2,942 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

2,942
Employers
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
57,976
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Fiberglass Pool Manufacturing average 4.4 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.3 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

4.4
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
2,942
employers reporting
57,976
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Fiberglass Pool Manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Fiberglass Pool Manufacturing sector (NAICS 326199) encompasses 2,942 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 57,976 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.4 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.4 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Fiberglass Pool Manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 28 of 60
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
C&E Plastics Inc. Georgetown, PA C 3.7
Quality Assured Plastics, inc. Lawrence, MI C 3.7
Hilco Technologies Grand Rapids, MI C 3.7
Letica-Oregon St. Helens, OR C 3.7
Raleigh Precision Products - Kenly Kenly, NC C 3.7
Fibergrate Composite Structures Incorporated Stephenville, TX C 3.7
Checkpoint Systems Inc. Canton, OH C 3.7
Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. Paramount, CA C 3.7
Basilius, Inc Toledo, OH C 3.7
Dkm Manufacturing Inc Victor, IA C 3.7
American Casting Manufacturing Plainview, NY C 3.7
Essentra Components - Station Road Erie, PA C 3.6
Aptar - Mukwonago Mukwonago, WI C 3.6
Injection Molding Solutions Siren, WI C 3.6
Tulip Molded Plastics, LLC Niagara Falls, NY C 3.6
Rodon Limited Partnership Hatfield, PA C 3.6
Amesbury Group Inc. Statesville, NC C 3.6
Rieke - New Albany New Albany, OH C 3.6
American Flange & MFG CO Carol Stream, IL C 3.6
Cooper Standard Automotive - East Tawas Plant East Tawas, MI C 3.6
NOV Fiberglass Systems Mount Union, PA C 3.6
IMS Gear Georgia, LLC Gainesville, GA C 3.6
Mauser Packaging Solutions Bryan, TX C 3.6
PakTech Irving Road Eugene, OR C 3.6
MEP - Main Lebanon, MO C 3.6
Schluter Systems, LP Plattsburgh, NY C 3.6
Sinclair and Rush Fenton St. Louis, MO C 3.6
Exide Technologies - Lampeter Lancaster, PA C 3.6
Schafer Systems (2018) Inc. Adair, IA C 3.6
Custom-Pak Arkansas Walnut Ridge, AR C 3.6
Scepter Manufacturing Miami, OK C 3.6
Retal Pa, LLC Donora, PA C 3.6
Nyloncraft Jonesville, MI C 3.6
Adapt Loves Park, IL C 3.6
Decoration and Assembly Warren, PA C 3.6
Otter Products Salazar Frederick, CO C 3.6
Adrian Inteva Adrian, MI C 3.6
Virtual Polymer Compounds Getzville, NY C 3.6
PTA Plastics Oxford Oxford, CT C 3.6
ATI El Paso, LLC El Paso, TX C 3.6
Norma Michigan St Clair St Clair, MI C 3.6
Expert Rotomolding Batavia, OH C 3.6
Mauser packaging solutions South Plainfield, NJ C 3.6
Donnelly Custom Mfg Alexandria, MN C 3.6
BUD/alan Plastics, inc. Camdenton, MO C 3.6
Polytainers Inc. Lee'S Summit, MO C 3.6
Dimatic Die and Tool Omaha, NE C 3.6
Tensar Geogrid Blackwell Blackwell, OK C 3.6
K & K Thermoforming LLC Southbridge, MA C 3.6
Cullman Hudsonville, MI C 3.6
← Prev Page 28 of 60 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Fiberglass Pool Manufacturing?

This sector averages 4.4 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.