Industry profile · NAICS 562111

Garbage collection services

Workplace injury rates across 1,706 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,706
Employers
6.3
Avg TCR
2.6
BLS benchmark
37,970
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Garbage collection services average 6.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 2.4 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.6.

6.3
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.6
BLS national benchmark
1,706
employers reporting
37,970
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Garbage collection services Safety Data Reveals

The Garbage collection services sector (NAICS 562111) encompasses 1,706 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 37,970 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 6.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.6 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 6.3 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Garbage collection services that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 9 of 50
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Parks Garbage Service - Chambersburg Chambersburg, PA F 9.8
Stericycle - Elizabeth,NJ Elizabeth, NJ F 9.8
Advanced Disposal - Somerset Somerset, PA F 9.8
G. Mello Disposal Georgetown, MA F 9.8
Recology Western Oregon Mcminnville, OR F 9.8
Columbus Indiana Operations Columbus, IN F 9.8
Department of Streets & Sanitation - Bureau of Sanitation District Sanitation Office - D7 Chicago, IL F 9.8
Solid Waste and Recycling Concord, NC F 9.8
SANCO Services Inc Escondido, CA F 9.7
Enviro Express Inc Bridgeport, CT F 9.7
Stericycle - Hayward,CA Hayward, CA F 9.7
Sun Valley Sun Valley, CA F 9.7
Dallas-Rowlett Dallas, TX F 9.7
McClellandtown Hauling Mcclellandtown, PA F 9.7
SaniPro dba Suburban Carting Co Briarcliff Manor, NY F 9.7
GME Sewell Sewell, NJ F 9.7
Somers Hauling Somers, NY F 9.7
West Oahu Aggregate, Co., Inc. Honolulu, HI F 9.7
Waste Pro 121 - Clearwater Clearwater, FL F 9.6
All Cycle Hauling Williston, VT F 9.6
Amwaste LLC Birmingham Birmingham, AL F 9.6
Republic Services Edwardsville Edwardsville, IL F 9.6
S10982 - Il Melrose Park Hauling Melrose Park, IL F 9.6
Homewood Disposal Service, Inc. Park Forest, IL F 9.5
Conwaste Recogido SJ Zona 3 Gurabo, PR F 9.5
Waste Services of TN-Kingston Kingston, TN F 9.5
Carmen Barbato, Inc. Hillsdale, NY F 9.5
Direct Waste Services Newark, NJ F 9.5
Bernardsville Hauling Bernardsville, NJ F 9.5
Conwaste Canovanas Gurabo, PR F 9.5
Waste Resources, Inc Los Angeles, CA F 9.5
S09945 - Lexington Hauling Lexington, SC F 9.5
Pine Tree Waste - Hermon Hermon, ME F 9.5
S02907 - Il Macomb Hauling Macomb, IL F 9.5
Burlington VT Collection Williston, VT F 9.5
Department of Streets & Sanitation - Bureau of Sanitation District Sanitation Office - D4 Chicago, IL F 9.5
Arizona City Casa Grande, AZ F 9.5
Jersey City TS/MRF Jersey City, NJ F 9.5
Advanced Disposal - Clay County Hauling Green Cove Springs, FL F 9.4
TDS Austin Buda, TX F 9.4
Hudson Baylor Cape May LLC Woodbine, NJ F 9.4
Environmental Management and Sustainability H320 Mesa, AZ F 9.4
GFL Environmental Dearborn Transfer Dearborn, MI F 9.4
S03076 - MI Marquette Marquette, MI F 9.4
Michael Brothers Recycling Pittsburgh, PA F 9.4
Sanitation Winston-Salem, NC F 9.3
New Solutions Tulsa, OK F 9.3
Des Moines -IA Des Moines, IA F 9.3
Oak Ridge Waste & Recycling of CT, LLC - Stamford Stamford, CT F 9.3
Waste Pro 613 - Baton Rouge Geismar, LA F 9.3
← Prev Page 9 of 50 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Garbage collection services?

This sector averages 6.3 against a BLS benchmark of 2.6 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.