Industry profile · NAICS 339114

Impression material, dental, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 125 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

125
Employers
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
1,289
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Impression material, dental, manufacturing average 2.9 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

2.9
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
125
employers reporting
1,289
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Impression material, dental, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Impression material, dental, manufacturing sector (NAICS 339114) encompasses 125 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 1,289 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.9 is below the BLS benchmark — a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers — not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Impression material, dental, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 3 of 3
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Dentsply Sirona Tulsa Dental Specialties JOHNSON CITY, TN A 0.5
BioHorizons Implant Systems, Inc. BIRMINGHAM, AL A 0.5
Ultradent Products Inc. Towers SOUTH JORDAN, UT A 0.4
Ultradent Dental Manufacturing B1 SOUTH JORDAN, UT A 0.4
Corporate Office MALVERN, PA A 0.4
Algonquin/Corporate ALGONQUIN, IL A 0.3
Claire Manufacturing LEHI, UT A 0.3
Dentsply Sirona RICHARDSON, TX A 0.3
BAE Systems, Inc. SJC SAN JOSE, CA A 0.3
Jensen Industries NORTH HAVEN, CT A 0.2
Sprig Oral Health Technologies, Inc. LOOMIS, CA A 0.2
Sterngold Dental LLC ATTLEBORO, MA C 0.0
Panoramic FORT WAYNE, IN C 0.0
Puragraft KINGWOOD, TX C 0.0
Preat SANTA MARIA, CA C 0.0
Salvin Dental Specialties CHARLOTTE, NC C 0.0
Nanova Biomaterials Inc 3806 Mojave Ct COLUMBIA, MO C 0.0
DMG America LLC Warehouse ENGLEWOOD, NJ C 0.0
CISLAK MANUFACTURING INC NILES, IL C 0.0
BAE Systems Electronic Systems SCA SAN JOSE, CA C 0.0
Sirona Dental Inc. LIC, NY C 0.0
UPI - Building 3 SOUTH JORDAN, UT C 0.0
JCM International Incorporated JOHNSON CITY, TN C 0.0
Ultradent Products Inc. B3 SANDY, UT C 0.0
Crosstex - CO ENGLEWOOD, CO C 0.0
cmp industries llc ALBANY, NY C 0.0
Park Dental Research ARDMORE, OK C 0.0
← Prev Page 3 of 3
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Impression material, dental, manufacturing?

This sector averages 2.9 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 — but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.