Industry profile · NAICS 812332

Industrial launderers

Workplace injury rates across 962 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

962
Employers
4.0
Avg TCR
2.1
BLS benchmark
11,162
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Industrial launderers average 4.0 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.9 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.1.

4.0
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.1
BLS national benchmark
962
employers reporting
11,162
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Industrial launderers Safety Data Reveals

The Industrial launderers sector (NAICS 812332) encompasses 962 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 11,162 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.0 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.1 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.0 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Industrial launderers that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 14 of 20
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
002k - Owatonna Mn Rntl Owatonna, MN C 2.1
015f - New Jersey Fs Union, NJ C 2.1
Lynchburg Va - 202 Lynchburg, VA C 2.1
Rochester Ny - 056 Rochester, NY C 2.1
02 - Dayton Vandalia, OH C 2.1
293 - Pensacola Pensacola, FL C 2.1
205 - Raleigh-Durham Durham, NC C 2.1
442 - Stevens Point Stevens Point, WI C 2.1
650 - Searcy Searcy, AR C 2.1
4021-A551 Dallas, TX C 2.1
21 - Bedford Park Bedford Park, IL C 2.1
385 - Culpeper Culpeper, VA C 2.1
491 - Amarillo Amarillo, TX C 2.1
049k - Fort Lauderdale Fl Rntl Fort Lauderdale, FL C 2.1
Reino Linen Services - Kalamazoo Kalamazoo, MI C 2.1
Garden City Ks - 245 Garden City, KS C 2.1
460 - Seattle Everett, WA C 2.0
Greenville Sc - 296 Simpsonville, SC C 2.0
82 - Northwest Houston Houston, TX C 2.0
539 - Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, TX C 2.0
0009 - Milford Milford, OH C 2.0
0g64 - Ft Wayne - North Ft Wayne, IN C 2.0
503 503-Fresno Ca Fresno, CA C 2.0
569 569-Chicago Cleanroom Il Burr Ridge, IL C 2.0
549 - Baton Rouge Baton Rouge, LA C 2.0
0j66 - Hattiesburg Ms Petal, MS C 2.0
626 - Santa Rosa Petaluma, CA C 2.0
300 - Westland Westland, MI C 2.0
458 458-Salt Lake City Ut Salt Lake City, UT C 2.0
North Atlanta - 261 Norcross, GA C 2.0
023k - South Chicago Il Rntl Justice, IL C 2.0
Cintas Loc 735 Wilkes-Barre, PA C 2.0
WHC-Franklin Street Brooklyn, NY C 2.0
0218 - Columbia Cayce, SC C 1.9
470 - Maple Grove Maple Grove, MN C 1.9
021m - St Paul Mn Rntl Saint Paul, MN C 1.9
Cincinnati Oh - 083 Franklin, OH C 1.9
31 - Madison Heights Madison Heights, MI C 1.9
524 - Bedford Bedford, VA C 1.9
257 257-Los Angeles Ca Vernon, CA C 1.9
319 - Nw Indiana Hammond, IN C 1.9
616 - Montgomery Montgomery, NY C 1.9
922 - Stockton Stockton, CA C 1.9
016m - Nw Houston Tx Rntl Houston, TX C 1.9
099k - South Charlotte Nc Rntl Charlotte, NC C 1.9
178 - Medford White City, OR C 1.9
492 - Fort Worth Fort Worth, TX C 1.9
0018 - Indianapolis Indianapolis, IN C 1.9
387 - Frederick Frederick, MD C 1.9
621 - Fresno Fresno, CA C 1.9
← Prev Page 14 of 20 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Industrial launderers?

This sector averages 4.0 against a BLS benchmark of 2.1 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.