Industry profile · NAICS 339112

Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 837 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

837
Employers
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
12,063
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing average 2.1 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

2.1
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
837
employers reporting
12,063
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing sector (NAICS 339112) encompasses 837 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 12,063 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.1 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.1 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 4 of 18
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
St Louis Syn O'Fallon, MO C 3.0
The Metrix Company Dubuque, IA C 3.0
NeedleTech Products, Inc North Attleboro, MA C 3.0
B & M Precision Ruskin, FL C 3.0
Instech Laboratories, Inc. Plymouth Meeting, PA C 3.0
Arthrex Manufacturing Inc Naples, FL C 3.0
King Systems Corp Noblesville, IN C 2.9
Henke Sass Wolf of America, Inc Dudley, MA C 2.9
BDI Moncks Corner Moncks Corner, SC C 2.9
Philips Athromed Menlo Park, CA C 2.9
Anika Therapeutics - Sarasota - 6423 Sarasota, FL C 2.9
St Louis KCI Saint Louis, MO C 2.9
Cook Incorporated Curry Pike Bloomington, IN C 2.9
Global Services Palm Beach Gardens Palm Beach Gardens, FL C 2.9
Coherex Medical Salt Lake City Salt Lake City, UT C 2.9
Teleflex (NeoTract Inc.) Pleasanton, CA C 2.9
Phillips Medisize Corporation - Phillips Medical New Richmond New Richmond, WI C 2.9
2284-212 East Farmingdale, NY C 2.9
2284-807 Dillon, MT C 2.9
Wytech Industries LLC Rahway, NJ C 2.9
Complexus Medical Mishawaka, IN C 2.8
GEHC : Westborough MA, LS Westborough, MA C 2.8
Gauthier Biomedical Grafton, WI C 2.8
Abiomed, Inc. (Woburn) Woburn, MA C 2.8
Nh01-Seabk-Seabrook - New Hampshire Seabrook, NH C 2.8
Katecho, Inc. Des Moines, IA C 2.8
Austin St. Elmo Austin, TX C 2.8
NN Life Sciences Design & Development Mansfield, MA C 2.8
2284-140 Houston, TX C 2.8
Stryker TMJ- CMF Ventura, CA C 2.8
Haemonetics - Draper Draper, UT C 2.7
Draeger Medical Systems, Inc. - Montgomeryville Montgomeryville, PA C 2.7
Metal Craft Engineering Elk River, MN C 2.7
Laborie Mechanicsburg Mechanicsburg, PA C 2.7
Arthrex California Inc Walnut, CA C 2.7
RAUMEDIC Inc. Mills River, NC Mills River, NC C 2.7
Southern Carbide Quitman, GA C 2.7
Spectranetics/Philips - Fremont South Fremont, CA C 2.7
Vita Needle Company Needham, MA C 2.7
Teleflex Medical OEM - Maple Grove Maple Grove, MN C 2.7
Mii Nj1 Hamilton, NJ C 2.7
Quincy Quincy, MA C 2.7
Terumo Cardiovascular Elkton Plant Elkton, MD B 2.6
Maquet Cardiovascular Wayne, NJ B 2.6
NeuroVasc Technologies, Inc. Irvine, CA B 2.6
Insulet Corporation Irvine California, CA B 2.6
CIVCO Medical Solutions - Manufacturing Kalona, IA B 2.6
CI-Curry Bloomington, IN B 2.6
Kenansville Neogen Kenansville, NC B 2.6
Engineered Medical Systems Memphis, TN B 2.6
← Prev Page 4 of 18 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing?

This sector averages 2.1 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.