Industry profile · NAICS 237120

Natural gas pipeline construction

Workplace injury rates across 1,128 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,128
Employers
1.2
Avg TCR
2.8
BLS benchmark
6,429
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Natural gas pipeline construction average 1.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 2.8.

1.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.8
BLS national benchmark
1,128
employers reporting
6,429
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Natural gas pipeline construction Safety Data Reveals

The Natural gas pipeline construction sector (NAICS 237120) encompasses 1,128 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 6,429 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.8 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.2 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Natural gas pipeline construction that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 18 of 23
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Lake Charles Office Sulphur, LA C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Phillips 66-Westlake Westlake, LA C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Venture Global LNG-Cameron Cameron, LA C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Formosa-Point Comfort Point Comfort, TX C 0.0
Baywater Pipeline Services, LLC Houma, LA C 0.0
Pipeline Construction & Maintenance, Inc Houma, LA C 0.0
Complete Integrity Services Rockwall, TX C 0.0
Southern Pipeline Construction Co., Inc. Searcy, AR C 0.0
Robert Heely Inc., DBA RHC Bakersfield, CA C 0.0
Corporate Office New Braunfels, TX C 0.0
Bridgeport, TX Bridgeport, TX C 0.0
MJ Pipeline, Inc. Shelocta, PA C 0.0
CB&I Storage Tank Solutions LLC PLNG Port Sulphur, LA C 0.0
Azteca Energy Services Dallas, TX C 0.0
Vaughn Management LLC, DBA Cera Solutions Austin, TX C 0.0
Ccl E&C Gregory, TX C 0.0
A-1 Pump Inc Bryan, TX C 0.0
105532 - MECI P66 Rodeo Renewed - IOS Project Rodeo, CA C 0.0
CAM Industrial Solutions @ ChampionX Sugarland Sugarland, TX C 0.0
CAM Industrial Solutions @ Citgo Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, TX C 0.0
CAM Industrial Solutions @ Dow Louisiana Operations Plaquemine, LA C 0.0
CAM Industrial Solutions @ Nalco Fresno Fresno, TX C 0.0
CAM Industrial Solutions @ Nalco Garyville Garyville, LA C 0.0
CAM Industrial Solutions @ Sabic Bay St. Louis Bay St. Louis, MS C 0.0
CAM Industrial Solutions @ ExxonMobil Baton Rouge Complex Baton Rouge, LA C 0.0
CAM Industrial Solutions @ ExxonMobil Port Allen Lubricants Port Allen, LA C 0.0
CAM Industrial Solutions @ ExxonMobil Mont Belvieu Baytown, TX C 0.0
Piping Technology Company Mcpherson, KS C 0.0
U7093 - BM LE-2 Tanks Freeport, TX C 0.0
Benton Georgia LLC SP Atlanta, GA C 0.0
Benton Georgia LLC Nashville Madison, TN C 0.0
Benton Georgia LLC San Antonio San Antonio, TX C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Golden Pass-Starks Starks, LA C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Golden Pass-Vidor Orange, TX C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Westlake-Plaquemine Plaquemine, LA C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Air Products-Laporte Laporte, TX C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Intel-Chandler Chandler, AZ C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Linde-LaPorte Laporte, TX C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Linde-Taylor Taylor, TX C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Roehm-Bay City Bay City, TX C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Eastman-Kingsport Kingsport, TN C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Bay Ltd. Yard Aransas Pass, TX C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - SpaceX-Brownsville Brownsville, TX C 0.0
Centuri Group Inc. - Centuri Corporate Phoenix, AZ C 0.0
105728 - Freeport UGS Return to Service Carrying Freeport, UT C 0.0
Meche Construction LLC Lafayette, LA C 0.0
EXCEL Contractors @ Dow Chemical Plaquemine Plaquemine, LA C 0.0
8497_20186 Idaho Falls, ID C 0.0
Toro Services LLC Woodward, OK C 0.0
Blanchard Industrial, LLC Galliano, LA C 0.0
← Prev Page 18 of 23 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Natural gas pipeline construction?

This sector averages 1.2 against a BLS benchmark of 2.8 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.