Industry profile · NAICS 237120

Natural gas pipeline construction

Workplace injury rates across 1,128 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,128
Employers
1.2
Avg TCR
2.8
BLS benchmark
6,429
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Natural gas pipeline construction average 1.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 2.8.

1.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.8
BLS national benchmark
1,128
employers reporting
6,429
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Natural gas pipeline construction Safety Data Reveals

The Natural gas pipeline construction sector (NAICS 237120) encompasses 1,128 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 6,429 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.8 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.2 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Natural gas pipeline construction that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 17 of 23
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Performance Contractors, Inc. - INEOS Chocolate Bayou Alvin, TX A 0.1
Jasper Ventures Inc Troup, TX A 0.1
105186 - USGC ll Ethylene Plant Orange, TX A 0.1
104000 - Calcasieu Pass Cameron Parish, LA A 0.1
105128 - P66 Rodeo Renewed: PTU/FRU BB Rodeo, CA A 0.0
Bluewater Constructors, Inc. Houston, TX A 0.0
Castle Energy Group, LLC Meridian, MS A 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Exxon Baytown Baytown, TX A 0.0
Ntact Constructors, Ltd. Midland, TX A 0.0
Cain's Pipeline and Industrial Services Addis, LA C 0.0
Parker Lane Hurst, TX C 0.0
optimal Geismar, LA C 0.0
EXCEL Maintenance @ Westlake, Calvert City KY Calvert City, KY C 0.0
Benton's Equipment & Construction, Inc Sulphur, LA C 0.0
Fuel Pros, Inc. Chino, CA C 0.0
Main Office Humble, TX C 0.0
Gas Field Specialists - 2 Mansfield, PA C 0.0
Gas Field Specialists - 3 Horseheads, NY C 0.0
Lane Pipeline Construction, LLC. Clarksburg, WV C 0.0
Pipeline Controls & Services, Inc. Atlanta, GA C 0.0
Chemex Global, LLC The Woodlands, TX C 0.0
NOB_IFS Seattle, WA C 0.0
Burnt Mountain Services LLC Mead, CO C 0.0
Trinity Industrial Services, LLC Beaumont, TX C 0.0
SilverLynx Construction LLC Silsbee, TX C 0.0
Pilgrim Construction Co., LLC Heidelberg, MS C 0.0
Veterans Utility Services, LLC Jackson, MI C 0.0
Ally Enterprises Bakersfield, CA C 0.0
Michels Utility Services Inc-CT-Waterford Waterford, CT C 0.0
Michels Pipeline Inc-PA-Washington Washington, PA C 0.0
So Cal Gas Visalia, CA C 0.0
Bay Ltd. @ at Valero Corpus Christi Bill Greehey Refinery Corpus Christi, TX C 0.0
Bay Ltd. @ Valero Texas City Refinery Corpus Christi, TX C 0.0
Bay Ltd. @ CVR Refining LP Kansas Corpus Christi, TX C 0.0
Driver Pipeline Company, Inc. - Tye, TX Tye, TX C 0.0
EXCEL Maintenance @ SNF Flopam Plaquemine, LA C 0.0
Torc, LLC Gillette, WY C 0.0
MAXX North America USA, LTD Carlsbad, NM C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Dow-Hahnville Hahnville, LA C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Dyno Nobel-Waggaman Westwego, LA C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Baton Rouge Office Baton Rouge, LA C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Westlake-Geismar Geismar, LA C 0.0
Abercrombie Pipeline Services, LLC Sylmar Sylmar, CA C 0.0
Abercrombie Pipeline Services, LLC Bozeman Bozeman, MT C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Intel-Rio Rancho Rio Rancho, NM C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Rosharon Office Rosharon, TX C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Phillips 66-Old Ocean Old Ocean, TX C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Southeast Fab Shop Theodore, AL C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Mobile Office Irvington, AL C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Firestone Poymers-Sulphur Sulphur, LA C 0.0
← Prev Page 17 of 23 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Natural gas pipeline construction?

This sector averages 1.2 against a BLS benchmark of 2.8 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.