Industry profile · NAICS 541380

Non-destructive testing laboratories or services

Workplace injury rates across 321 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

321
Employers
1.9
Avg TCR
0.5
BLS benchmark
1,998
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Non-destructive testing laboratories or services average 1.9 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 3.9 times the BLS national benchmark of 0.5.

1.9
avg TCR · reporting employers
0.5
BLS national benchmark
321
employers reporting
1,998
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Non-destructive testing laboratories or services Safety Data Reveals

The Non-destructive testing laboratories or services sector (NAICS 541380) encompasses 321 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 1,998 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 0.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.9 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Non-destructive testing laboratories or services that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 3 of 7
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
G3 Quality Inc - Cerritos Cerritos, CA F 1.3
Customer Solutions Center Englewood, CO F 1.2
Waterbury Center VT Waterbury, VT F 1.2
RMA-Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, CA F 1.2
Associated Pathologist, LLC dba PathGroup Brentwood, TN F 1.1
Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Springdale Lab Springdale, AR F 1.1
Technical Safety Services La Jolla, CA F 1.1
Balazs Dallas Dallas, TX F 1.1
Phenova Golden, CO F 1.1
Ess - Bal Cranston, RI F 1.1
Linde - Special Projects (Murray Hill) Providence, NJ F 1.1
CTS Dallas Bedford, TX F 1.1
Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Green Bay Lab Green Bay, WI F 1.1
MacDermid Waterbury, CT F 1.0
TI Radco, LLP Long Beach, CA F 1.0
CTS Tampa St. Petersburg, FL F 1.0
TestAmerica Laboratories Inc North Canton, OH F 1.0
Arizona Proving Grounds Yucca, AZ F 1.0
Stenstrom Protanic Saukville, WI F 1.0
Freeport-McMoRan Technology Center Tucson, AZ F 1.0
Element Minneapolis-Bloomington Minneapolis, MN D 1.0
Janssen Titusville Titusville, NJ D 1.0
Phoenix TEQ - Cincinnati, LLC Springboro, OH D 1.0
Chicago Testing Laboratory, Inc. Thornton, IL D 1.0
Arizona Proving Ground Yucca, AZ D 0.9
Raba Kistner, Inc - Austin Austin, TX D 0.9
Biotex, Inc. Houston, TX D 0.9
Northern Biomedical Research Norton Shores, MI D 0.9
National Oilwell Varco - Houston Rig Pressure Control - R&D Houston, TX D 0.9
WuXi Advanced Therapies Philadelphia, PA D 0.9
Phoenix TEQ - Rockport, LLC Springboro, OH D 0.9
Hibbing - BIC Hibbing, MN D 0.9
CTS St. Louis St. Louis, MO D 0.9
Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Los Angeles Lab Commerce, CA D 0.9
Ca Vri San Francisco, CA D 0.8
Novelis, Inc. Kennesaw, GA D 0.8
Interpoll Laboratories, Inc. Circle Pines, MN D 0.8
RTC-Wide Engineering and Support Services Redstone Arsenal, AL D 0.8
WI115 Neenah Research Center Neenah, WI D 0.8
Midland-Clean Chemistry Inc. Midland, TX D 0.8
KBI Biopharma - Louisville Louisville, CO D 0.8
2582-Pfizer-Webro Road-Parsippany, NJ Parsippany, NJ D 0.8
Mercedes-Benz USA - Engineering Services Jacksonville, FL D 0.8
Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Columbus Lab Columbus, OH D 0.8
Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Phoenix Lab Phoenix, AZ D 0.8
Balazs Fremont Fremont, CA D 0.8
SKF North American Technical Center Plymouth, MI D 0.7
Food Safety Net Services, Ltd. San Antonio, TX D 0.7
METCO Carrollton, TX D 0.7
Sonic Systems International - Energy Services Group Wilmington, NC D 0.7
← Prev Page 3 of 7 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Non-destructive testing laboratories or services?

This sector averages 1.9 against a BLS benchmark of 0.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.