Industry profile · NAICS 326150

Polyurethane foam products manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 498 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

498
Employers
3.9
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
6,523
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Polyurethane foam products manufacturing average 3.9 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.2 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

3.9
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
498
employers reporting
6,523
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Polyurethane foam products manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Polyurethane foam products manufacturing sector (NAICS 326150) encompasses 498 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 6,523 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.9 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Polyurethane foam products manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 3 of 10
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Victory Foam, Inc. Irvine, CA D 5.7
American Converters, Inc. - Colorado Longmont, CO D 5.6
Hickory Foam Fabrication Claremont, NC D 5.6
CMT Materials, LLC Attleboro, MA D 5.6
Penn Foam Corp. Allentown, PA D 5.5
Compsys Inc. Melbourne, FL D 5.5
Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Terrell Terrell, TX D 5.5
ACA-Tennessee Dickson, TN D 5.5
KTM Industries, Inc Holt, MI D 5.5
Plymouth Foam Plymouth, WI D 5.5
Rim Manufacturing, LLC Weatherford, TX D 5.5
G&T Industries, Inc. of MI Byron Center, MI D 5.5
FXI - Orange Orange, CA D 5.5
Cushions to Go Pontotoc Pontotoc, MS D 5.4
Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Longview Longview, WA D 5.4
Molnlycke Manufacturing US - WCC Wiscasset, ME D 5.3
Dalton Foam div. NCFI, Polyurethanes Dalton, GA D 5.2
Cassemco Cookeville, TN D 5.2
Future Foam Council Bluffs, IA D 5.2
Hearing Components, Inc. Oakdale, MN D 5.1
Sekisui Voltek, LLC, Coldwater Coldwater, MI D 5.0
Eagle Industries, Inc. Wixom, MI D 5.0
Ralph S. Alberts Co., Inc. Montoursville, PA D 5.0
Lenoir Lenoir, NC D 5.0
Perma-Pipe, Inc. -- New Iberia, LA New Iberia, LA D 4.9
Lear Corporation - Selma Selma, AL D 4.9
FRP - Iowa Monticello, IA D 4.9
Unicast Inc Easton, PA D 4.8
Fehrer Automotive- Gadsden Gadsden, AL D 4.8
Hunter Panels - Montgomery Montgomery, NY D 4.8
Buckley Industries, Inc. Park City, KS D 4.8
SEKISUI Voltek, LLC Coldwater, MI D 4.8
Blachford Investments Inc. West Chicago, IL D 4.7
Hi-Tech Indianapolis, IN D 4.7
Ivex Protective Packaging, LLC Stolle Facility Sidney, OH D 4.6
Hunter Panels - Tooele Tooele, UT D 4.6
Rfc Ct Bloomfield, CT D 4.5
Riverside Pouring Plant Riverside, CA D 4.5
Future Foam KC Kansas City, MO D 4.5
Future Foam Inc. Plant 5 Kansas City, MO D 4.5
Bridgestone APM FPD Plant #4 Dickson, TN D 4.5
Prestige Fabricator's Inc. Plant 1 Asheboro, NC D 4.5
Miami Site Opa-Locka, FL D 4.5
American Excelsior Company Sheboygan Sheboygan, WI D 4.4
Foam Distributors Inc Hayward, CA D 4.4
Future Foam High Point High Point, NC D 4.4
Aeroflex Manufacturing Facility Sweetwater, TN D 4.4
Mary Ann Industries Villa Rica, GA D 4.3
Future Foam Dallas, TX D 4.3
Hunter Panels - Lake City Lake City, FL D 4.3
← Prev Page 3 of 10 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Polyurethane foam products manufacturing?

This sector averages 3.9 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.