Industry profile · NAICS 326150

Polyurethane foam products manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 498 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

498
Employers
3.9
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
6,523
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Polyurethane foam products manufacturing average 3.9 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.2 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

3.9
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
498
employers reporting
6,523
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Polyurethane foam products manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Polyurethane foam products manufacturing sector (NAICS 326150) encompasses 498 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 6,523 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.9 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Polyurethane foam products manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 4 of 10
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Cushions to Go Baldwyn Baldwyn, MS D 4.3
Progressive Materials, LLC New Albany, IN D 4.3
Hubco Inc. Alden, NY D 4.3
Plascore Inc (Plastics) Zeeland, MI D 4.3
Armacell Spencer, WV D 4.3
Accella Polyurethane Systems Cartersville Plant Cartersville, GA D 4.3
Albert Lea Plant Albert Lea, MN D 4.2
FXI, Inc. - Corry Corry, PA D 4.2
Ivex Protective Packaging, LLC Campbell Facility Sidney, OH D 4.2
Derby Fabricating Solutions - Louisville Louisville, KY D 4.2
Hydrofera LLC Manchester, CT D 4.2
Smithers-Oasis Stow St Kent, OH D 4.1
G&T Industries Of Michigan Byron Center, MI D 4.0
FXI - Portland Portland, OR D 4.0
Rmax - Dallas Dallas, TX D 4.0
Rmax - Greer Greer, SC D 4.0
Tjm5519 Milwaukee, WI D 4.0
Sekisui Voltek, LLC, Lawrence Lawrence, MA D 4.0
Indianapolis Zionsville Indianapolis, IN C 4.0
Crest-Foam Corp. Fort Worth, TX C 4.0
American Converters, Inc. Fridley, MN C 3.9
Elite Comfort Solutions, LLC Carthage, MO C 3.9
Foam Products Corporation Calhoun, GA C 3.9
Sponge Cushion Morris, IL C 3.9
Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Chattanooga Chattanooga, TN C 3.9
Pregis-Garland Garland, TX C 3.9
Creative Foam - PDC Flint, MI C 3.9
GRFT-SOTEX Mcallen, TX C 3.8
Future Foam Plant 38 Kent, WA C 3.8
Coleman Company - NEKS Wichita, KS C 3.8
Novation iQ Lenexa, KS C 3.8
Richmond Plant Richmond, VA C 3.8
Aeroflex USA Sweetwater, TN C 3.8
UFP Technologies Denver, CO C 3.8
Woodbridge Foam Fabricators, Inc Chattanooga, TN C 3.8
Tecnifoam Circle Pines, MN C 3.8
Vintage Ontario, CA C 3.8
Verona Fab Verona, MS C 3.7
LPCC-Fort Worth Rebond Fort Worth, TX C 3.7
McKenzie Creative Brands Albemarle, NC C 3.7
Rfc Pa King of Prussia, PA C 3.7
Harmony Cushion Company Valdese, NC C 3.7
ICP - Akron Akron, OH C 3.7
Plant 22 Fairless Hills Fairless Hills, PA C 3.7
Rogers Foam Somerville Somerville, MA C 3.6
American Excelsior Company Arlington Arlington, TX C 3.6
Ferdinand Branch Plant Ferdinand, IN C 3.6
UFP Technologies GT Georgetown, MA C 3.6
Altoona Plant Altoona, PA C 3.6
New Castle, IN New Castle, IN C 3.6
← Prev Page 4 of 10 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Polyurethane foam products manufacturing?

This sector averages 3.9 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.