Industry profile · NAICS 325910

Printing inks manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 128 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

128
Employers
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
1,191
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Printing inks manufacturing average 2.9 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

2.9
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
128
employers reporting
1,191
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Printing inks manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Printing inks manufacturing sector (NAICS 325910) encompasses 128 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 1,191 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.9 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Printing inks manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 3
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Wikoff Color Corp. - Alpharetta Alpharetta, GA C 2.8
Fujifilm Imaging Colorants Newcastle, DE C 2.8
Nazdar SourceOne Georgia Norcross, GA C 2.7
Flint Group Packaging Inks North America LLC - Ontario Ontario, CA B 2.6
Actega North America - Charlotte UV Charlotte, NC B 2.6
Amica Software Irvine, CA B 2.5
INX International Ink Co. (6400) Charlotte, NC B 2.5
Flint Group Packaging Inks North America LLC - Dallas Dallas, TX B 2.5
Wikoff Color Corp. - Grand Rapids Grand Rapids, MI B 2.5
2135 Manufacturing LLC Rockingham, NC B 2.4
Sun Chemical Frankfort NAI Frankfort, IN B 2.3
Flint Group Packaging Inks North America LLC - Rogers Rogers, MN B 2.2
INX International Ink Co. (3900) Homewood, IL B 2.1
Flint Group Weyers Cave Weyers Cave, VA B 2.1
Evansville, IN Evansville, IN B 2.0
Sun Chemical - Northlake Northlake, IL B 2.0
Lebanon Flint Group Lebanon, OH B 2.0
Nazdar SourceOne California Garden Grove, CA B 2.0
Sun Chemical Northlake Northlake, IL B 2.0
Actega North America - Lincolnton Lincolnton, NC B 1.9
Penn Color Elmwood Park Elmwood Park, NJ B 1.9
1ATL Sun Chemical Atlanta, GA B 1.8
Flint Group NA Beaufort, SC Beaufort, SC B 1.8
Flint Group Elizabethtown, KY B 1.8
Flint Group - Winston Salem, NC Winston-Salem, NC B 1.7
Clover Technologies Group, LLC - Ithaca Raycraft Ithaca, MI B 1.7
SICPA Securink Corp. Springfield, VA A 1.6
Sun Chemical Corporation Grand Prairie CSC Grand Prairie, TX A 1.6
Sun Chemical Plates Concord Concord, CA A 1.5
Ink Systems Inc Commerce, CA A 1.5
Nazdar SourceOne New Jersey Pennsauken, NJ A 1.4
Clover Imaging Group LLC - Ithaca, MI (Union St) Ithaca, MI A 1.4
Charleston SC IW Plant North Charleston, SC A 1.4
Sun Chemical Atlanta Mfg Atlanta, GA A 1.4
Fujifilm Imaging Colorants, Inc. New Castle, DE A 1.4
INX International Ink Co. (3100) Appleton, WI A 1.3
Sun Chemical CTS/Inplant Group Northlake, IL A 1.3
ATL-NAZ-ATLANTA Norcross, GA A 1.3
Momar, Inc. Atlanta, GA A 1.2
Midwest Ink Broadview, IL A 1.2
Clover Imaging Group LLC - Ithaca, MI (Raycraft Rd) Ithaca, MI A 1.0
Kao Collins Inc. - Edison Cincinnati, OH A 1.0
Flint Group Atlanta GA Atlanta, GA A 1.0
Pine Bluff Flint Group Pine Bluff, AR A 0.9
Braden Sutphin Ink Cleveland, OH A 0.9
sinkrocincinnati Cincinnati, OH A 0.9
One Stroke Inks Louisville, KY A 0.8
IP Specialty Products Marysville Ink Marysville, OH A 0.8
Clover Technologies Group, LLC - Ithaca Union Ithaca, MI A 0.8
Sun Chemical East Rutherford East Rutherford, NJ A 0.8
← Prev Page 2 of 3 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Printing inks manufacturing?

This sector averages 2.9 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.