Industry profile · NAICS 922150

Rehabilitation services, correctional, government

Workplace injury rates across 91 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

91
Employers
4.3
Avg TCR
3.2
BLS benchmark
2,694
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Rehabilitation services, correctional, government average 4.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.3 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.2.

4.3
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.2
BLS national benchmark
91
employers reporting
2,694
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Rehabilitation services, correctional, government Safety Data Reveals

The Rehabilitation services, correctional, government sector (NAICS 922150) encompasses 91 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 2,694 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.2 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.3 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Rehabilitation services, correctional, government that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 2
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Michigan Department of Corrections - Eastern District Probation DETROIT, MI B 2.3
Probation SUSANVILLE, CA B 2.2
Michigan Department of Corrections - Southwest District Probation LINCOLN PARK, MI B 2.1
Michigan Department of Corrections - Pontiac Probation PONTIAC, MI B 2.0
District 25 Probation & Parole LEESBURG, VA B 2.0
Maricopa County - Adult Probation (110) PHOENIX, AZ B 1.9
New London Adult Probation NEW LONDON, CT B 1.9
MN Dept Corrections-Community Services ST. PAUL, MN B 1.9
KGPO KINGMAN PROBATION KINGMAN, AZ B 1.8
Michigan Department of Corrections - Troy Probation TROY, MI B 1.8
Minnesota Department of Corrections - Community Services ST. PAUL, MN B 1.8
Virginia Center for Behavioral Rehabilitation BURKEVILLE, VA B 1.7
DPSCS DPP East Region BALTIMORE, MD B 1.7
New Haven Adult Probation NEW HAVEN, CT B 1.7
Morgan County Community Corrections Annex MARTINSVILLE, IN B 1.6
BHPO BHC PROBATION BULLHEAD CITY, AZ B 1.6
Michigan Department of Corrections - Macomb Probation MT. CLEMENS, MI A 1.6
Brooklyn House BROOKLYN, NY A 1.4
Michigan Department of Corrections - Washtenaw County Probation ANN ARBOR, MI A 1.4
Michigan Department of Corrections - Macomb Parole ROSEVILLE, MI A 1.3
Department of Corrections Probation & Parole District 15 SALEM, VA A 1.3
Probation Administrative Office SANTA ANA, CA A 1.2
Administartion Office WATERBURY, CT A 0.9
Madison County Probation Department EDWARDSVILLE, IL A 0.9
VADOC District #43 Probation & Parole CEDAR BLUFF, VA A 0.8
Probation Manchester Office ORANGE, CA A 0.8
Probation North County Field Services Office ANAHEIM, CA A 0.8
Probation Santa Ana Office SANTA ANA, CA A 0.7
DOCCR-Admin and Field Services MINNEAPOLIS, MN A 0.5
County Probation KANKAKEE, IL A 0.3
Cook County Juvenile Probation - Chicago CHICAGO, IL A 0.2
Court Services BUFFALO, MN C 0.0
Hartford Adult Probation HARTFORD, CT C 0.0
Wright County- Court Services BUFFALO, MN C 0.0
District 35 Probation and Parole MANASSAS, VA C 0.0
Probation South County Field Services Office LAGUNA HILLS, CA C 0.0
Michigan Department of Corrections - Court Services Unit DETROIT, MI C 0.0
Virginia Department of Corrections-District #21 Probation and Parole FREDERICKSBURG, VA C 0.0
District 9 Probation and Parole CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA C 0.0
Michigan Department of Corrections - Jackson County Probation JACKSON, MI C 0.0
Fairfax District 29 Probation & Parole FAIRFAX, VA C 0.0
← Prev Page 2 of 2
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Rehabilitation services, correctional, government?

This sector averages 4.3 against a BLS benchmark of 3.2 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.