Industry profile · NAICS 221310

Water supply systems

Workplace injury rates across 836 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

836
Employers
5.2
Avg TCR
1.2
BLS benchmark
13,051
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Water supply systems average 5.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 4.4 times the BLS national benchmark of 1.2.

5.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
1.2
BLS national benchmark
836
employers reporting
13,051
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Water supply systems Safety Data Reveals

The Water supply systems sector (NAICS 221310) encompasses 836 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 13,051 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 1.2 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.2 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Water supply systems that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 14 of 17
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Fort Meade Fort Meade, MD C 1.2
EJ Water - Office / Shop Dieterich, IL C 1.1
Belle Mead Production Hillsborough, NJ C 1.1
Pine Bluff Office Pine Bluff, AR C 1.1
Si Environmental, LLC - Cypress Houston, TX C 1.1
City of Oak Forest - Public Works Oak Forest, IL C 1.1
Kanawha Valley Water Treatment Plant Charleston, WV C 1.1
Landmark Irrigation - Madera Madera, CA C 1.1
Harpeth Valley Utilities District Nashville, TN C 1.1
Customer Service Center Monroe, CT C 1.1
Atascadero Mutual Water Company - Shop Atascadero, CA C 1.1
Suburban Water Systems - LM La Mirada, CA C 1.1
Suburban Water Systems - Main Office (SJH) Covina, CA C 1.0
LPSCO Goodyear, AZ C 1.0
American Water Short Hills, NJ C 1.0
Semitropic Water Storage District Wasco, CA C 1.0
Virginia American Water - Alexandria District Alexandria, VA C 1.0
Milton Milton, PA C 1.0
Great Lakes Water Authority - Adminstration Detroit, MI C 1.0
Water Treatment Lake Havasu City, AZ B 0.9
RK Water, LLC Denver, CO B 0.9
Portland Water Bureau Administration Portland, OR B 0.9
Pittsburgh Operations Carnegie, PA B 0.9
New Jersey American Water - Howell Field Ops Farmingdale, NJ B 0.9
Village of Sugar Grove Sugar Grove, IL B 0.9
Pennichuck Water Works, Inc. - Main Office Nashua, NH B 0.8
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Lake Elsinore, CA B 0.8
Village of Bartlett Water Division Bartlett, IL B 0.8
ILAWC Chicago Metro Woodridge, IL B 0.8
Rincon Del diablo municipal water district Escondido, CA B 0.8
Sacramento Suburban Water District Sacramento, CA B 0.8
Valley Water Users Tempe, AZ B 0.8
Wright Patterson AFB Wright Patterson Air Force Base, OH B 0.8
Virgina American Water - Hopewell District Hopewell, VA B 0.8
Premium Waters Jackson Byram, MS B 0.8
ILAWC Peoria Peoria, IL B 0.8
ILAWC Interurban Belleville, IL B 0.8
Aqueous Vets Redding Redding, CA B 0.7
Aqua Services, Inc. - Bryn Mawr Bryn Mawr, PA B 0.7
Suburban Water Systems - MO Covina, CA B 0.7
Administration Conway, SC B 0.7
GWRC Maricopa, AZ B 0.7
Loudoun Water Ashburn, VA B 0.7
Picatinny Arsenal Picatinny Arsenal, NJ B 0.7
US Bronco Services, Inc Fairfield, OH B 0.7
New Jersey American Water-RM/Canal Road Bridgewater, NJ B 0.7
6271-018 San Dimas, CA B 0.6
Fort Cavazos Fort Hood, TX B 0.6
Operations Services, Inc. Yorkville, IL A 0.6
6271-051 San Dimas, CA A 0.6
← Prev Page 14 of 17 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Water supply systems?

This sector averages 5.2 against a BLS benchmark of 1.2 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.