Air-conditioning and warm air heating combination units manufacturing · South Carolina

AIRSYS Cooling Technologies, Inc.

Greer, SC · ~32 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AIRSYS Cooling Technologies, Inc. runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Air-conditioning and warm air heating combination units manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

AIRSYS Cooling Technologies, Inc.: 4.5 TCR = 135% of Air-conditioning and warm air heating combination units manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AIRSYS Cooling Technologies, Inc. safety composite

AIRSYS Cooling Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

AIRSYS Cooling Technologies, Inc.: 4.1 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 4.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.08× in 2021

AIRSYS Cooling Technologies, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.7 from 4.1 in 2020 to 4.8 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333415 · Greer, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 135% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO STULZ Air Technology…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: STULZ Air Technology Systems, Inc. DAYTON (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

AIRSYS Cooling Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AIRSYS Cooling Technologies, Inc. averages 4.5 TCR (135% of the Air-conditioning and warm air heating combination units manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AIRSYS Cooling Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2020=4.1 · 2021=4.8 · BLS 3.3

Where AIRSYS Cooling Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

461 Air-conditioning and warm air establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Air-conditioning and warm air employers in South Carolina.

AIRSYS Cooling Technologies, Inc. (32 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate AIRSYS Cooling Technologies, Inc.
AIRSYS Cooling Technologies, Inc. (32 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8

AIRSYS Cooling Technologies, Inc. has fewer employees than the Air-conditioning and warm air heating co median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.8 4.8 2 0 0
2020 4.1 4.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333415 · SC · Greer

461 Air-conditioning and warm air heating combination units manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 204 employers in Greer, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR STULZ Air Technology Systems, Inc. DAYTON 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR O'FALLON 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Daikin Applied Americas 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hastings HVAC 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Humphrey Coker Seed Company Inc 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Humphrey Coker Seed Company - Salters Gin 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Utility 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ridgeland 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC 11,860 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utility Partners of America 1,095 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plastic Omnium Auto Exteriors, LLC 959 FTE
CITY-NEAR PRISMA HEALTH GREER MEDICAL CAMPUS 853 FTE
NAT-TCR Labelworks - 0021 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR LUTHERCARE-MEHLENBERG 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Florida Regional Hospital 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Gathm - Aap Thomson 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Florence Support 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Skeet Club 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delta 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corrosion 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.