Nuclear power plant construction · Maryland

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Calvert Cliffs Station

Lusby, MD · ~62 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Calvert Cliffs Station runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Nuclear power plant construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Calvert Cliffs Station: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Nuclear power plant construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Calvert Cliffs Station safety composite

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Calvert Cliffs Station scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Calvert Cliffs Station held a steady TCR band

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Calvert Cliffs Station's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.0 TCR.

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Lusby, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/26
  • PHOTO 15-100 IN
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 15-100 IN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Calvert Cliffs Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Allied Power Services - Exelon, Calvert Cliffs Station averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Nuclear power plant construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Calvert Cliffs Station TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Allied Power Services - Exelon, Calvert Cliffs Station falls in its industry

1,605 Nuclear power plant constructi establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 26 Nuclear power plant constructi employers in Maryland.

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Calvert Cliffs Station (62 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Allied Power Services - Exelon, Calvert Cliffs Station
Allied Power Services - Exelon, Calvert Cliffs Station (62 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Calvert Cliffs Station has fewer employees than the Nuclear power plant construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · MD · Lusby

1,605 Nuclear power plant construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 8 employers in Lusby, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 15-100 IN 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hanwha Q Cells USA Corp. 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 105185 - IPP Repowering- 840MW 2x2x1 CC 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Green Contracting Company, Inc. 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Volvo Baltimore RDC 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE S&J Service, Inc. 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Concrete Protection and Restoration, Inc. 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR 102148 - Cove Point LNG Export Terminal 1,416 FTE
CITY-NEAR Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant 889 FTE
CITY-NEAR COVE POINT 194 FTE
CITY-NEAR 100343 114 FTE
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1655 3rd St,San Francisco (MB3 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Peck's Market, Inc. 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Decatur BioProducts Warehouse 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE WST Westampton 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Paving Co., Inc. 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.