Armored military vehicles (except tanks) and parts manufacturing · Alabama

BAE Systems Logistics Center

Name: BAE Systems Logistics Center Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Anniston, AL · ~52 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 0.0
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BAE Systems Logistics Center runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Armored military vehicles (except tanks) and parts manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

BAE Systems Logistics Center: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Armored military vehicles (except tanks) and parts manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BAE Systems Logistics Center safety composite

BAE Systems Logistics Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

BAE Systems Logistics Center held a steady TCR band

BAE Systems Logistics Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.0 TCR.

2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336992 · Anniston, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #0/5
PHOTO BAE SYSTEMS
BOOK 3y book
INJ 0 inj
SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BAE SYSTEMS (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

BAE Systems In

0.7
Raytheon_El Pa

0.5
BAE SYSTEMS

0.1
AM General Tec

0.1
This site

0

What this shows BAE Systems Logistics Center averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Armored military vehicles (except tanks) and parts manufacturing BLS benchmark).

BAE Systems Logistics Center TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where BAE Systems Logistics Center falls in its industry

49 Armored military vehicles (exc establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 5 Armored military vehicles (exc employers in Alabama.

BAE Systems Logistics Center (52 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 2.9

BAE Systems Logistics Center has fewer employees than the Armored military vehicles (except tanks) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2023	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2022	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2021	0.0	0.0	0	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336992 · AL · Anniston

49 Armored military vehicles (except tanks) and parts manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 101 employers in Anniston, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	BAE SYSTEMS	STERLING HEIGHTS, MI	0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	AM General Technology and Engineering Center	AUBURN HILLS, MI	0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Raytheon_El Paso_TX_ Briggs Army Airfield	EL PASO, TX	0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	BAE Systems Inc.	AIKEN, SC	0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Mobile Division Hillcrest	MOBILE	52 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Birmingham Division Trussville Crew Headquarters	TRUSSVILLE	52 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Jasper Complex	JASPER	52 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Patton Chapel Crew Headquarters - APC	BIRMINGHAM	52 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Tyler Union	Anniston	432 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Tyler Union Anniston	Anniston	420 FTE
CITY-NEAR	International Automotive Components	Anniston	346 FTE
CITY-NEAR	International Automotive Components Anniston	Anniston	344 FTE
NAT-TCR	Carbro Constructors Corp Main	Warren, NJ	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Keller Warehouse	Defiance, OH	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Airborn Inc. Addison	Addison, TX	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	1655 3rd St,San Francisco (MB3	San Francisco, CA	0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE	G&L Corporation	Fort Wayne, IN	52 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Punderson Manor Lodge	Newbury, OH	52 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Medicalodges Independence	Independence, KS	52 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Medicalodges Paola	Paola, KS	52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.