Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Maryland

Brandon Shores Power Plant

Curtis Bay, MD · ~118 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brandon Shores Power Plant runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade D.

Brandon Shores Power Plant: 1.5 TCR = 126% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brandon Shores Power Plant safety composite

Brandon Shores Power Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2019→2024

Brandon Shores Power Plant injury rate improved

Brandon Shores Power Plant's TCR fell 1.4 from 1.4 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.4 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Curtis Bay, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 1.5 · 126% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/9
  • PHOTO Jeffrey Energy Center
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jeffrey Energy Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Brandon Shores Power Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brandon Shores Power Plant averages 1.5 TCR (126% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brandon Shores Power Plant TCR series: 2019=1.4 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Brandon Shores Power Plant falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 9 Electric power generation, fos employers in Maryland.

Brandon Shores Power Plant (118 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Brandon Shores Power Plant
Brandon Shores Power Plant (118 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Brandon Shores Power Plant has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.1 1.1 2 0 0
2022 2.5 1.7 3 0 0
2021 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2020 1.5 0.8 2 0 0
2019 1.4 1.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · MD · Curtis Bay

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 22 employers in Curtis Bay, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jeffrey Energy Center 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waterford Power, LLC 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mountain Creek Power, LLC 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brunner Island - Talen Energy 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bay Country Professional Concrete, LLC 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA MD Baltimore Plant 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE 752403898 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4501 Hollins Ferry Rd Ste 120 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fila USA, Inc. Brandon Woods Distribution Center 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brandon Shores 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manuel Luis Construction Company, Inc./M Luis Products, LLC 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR BAL-ODFL 134 FTE
NAT-TCR Corporate 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Wolverine Service Center 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Springfield Elementary 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR AMPCO Contracting, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Drummond Scientific Company 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fremont 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Messina Hof Wine Cellars, Inc. 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gregory Design and Manufacturing 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.