Conservation and reclamation agencies · Minnesota
Conservation Corps MN & IA
Saint Paul, MN · ~215 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 12.6
- Avg TCR
- 3.2
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Conservation Corps MN & IA runs at 395% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Conservation and reclamation agencies workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 12.6
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.2
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 139
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Conservation Corps MN & IA's OSHA Total Case Rate of 12.6 to the Conservation and reclamation agencies BLS benchmark of 3.2 (395% of benchmark) across 3 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Conservation Corps MN & IA's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.2 industry benchmark.
Where Conservation Corps MN & IA falls in its industry
518 Conservation and reclamation a establishmentsSafer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.
Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 48 Conservation and reclamation a employers in Minnesota.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 139 injuries, 33 illnesses shown on this page for Conservation Corps MN & IA are sourced from its own 3 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 924120 - Conservation and reclamation agencies.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
11 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 427,545 hours worked = 5.15 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Conservation Corps MN & IA (this establishment) | 12.63 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 3-year avg |
| Fish and game agencies industry avg | 3.20 | BLS IIF, NAICS 924120 |
| Minnesota state avg (all industries) | 5.18 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Conservation Corps MN & IA to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 27 reportable incidents · 25 injuries, 2 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 36 reportable incidents · 25 injuries, 11 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2022: 109 reportable incidents · 89 injuries, 20 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12.6 | 5.2 | 25 | 2 | 0 |
| 2023 | 82.5 | 34.4 | 25 | 11 | 0 |
| 2022 | 59.5 | 3.3 | 89 | 20 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Conservation Corps MN & IA's reported OSHA injury record versus its Conservation and reclamation agencies peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 395% of the Conservation and reclamation agencies benchmark, Conservation Corps MN & IA reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Conservation and reclamation agencies sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Conservation Corps MN & IA's safety grade?
How many injuries has Conservation Corps MN & IA reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Minnesota, and by nearby establishments in Saint Paul - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~12.6)
Similar size (~215 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.