Retaining walls, anchored (e.g., with piles, soil nails, tieback anchors), construction · California

Daysh Developments Inc.

Benicia, CA · ~32 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Daysh Developments Inc. runs at 115% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Retaining walls, anchored (e.g., with piles, soil nails, tieback anchors), construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Daysh Developments Inc.: 3.2 TCR = 115% of Retaining walls, anchored (e.g., with piles, soil nails, tieback anchors), construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Daysh Developments Inc. safety composite

Daysh Developments Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.2

2017→2023

Daysh Developments Inc. injury rate improved

Daysh Developments Inc.'s TCR fell 7.2 from 7.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.2 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Benicia, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 115% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #64/92
  • PHOTO Charleroi Locks & Dam
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Charleroi Locks & Dam (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Daysh Developments Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Daysh Developments Inc. averages 3.2 TCR (115% of the Retaining walls, anchored (e.g., with piles, soil nails, tieback anchors), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Daysh Developments Inc. TCR series: 2017=7.2 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Daysh Developments Inc. falls in its industry

932 Retaining walls, anchored (e.g establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #64 safest of 92 Retaining walls, anchored (e.g employers in California.

Daysh Developments Inc. (32 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Daysh Developments Inc.
Daysh Developments Inc. (32 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Daysh Developments Inc. has fewer employees than the Retaining walls, anchored (e.g., with pi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.5 5.5 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.5 6.5 2 0 0
2017 7.2 7.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · CA · Benicia

932 Retaining walls, anchored (e.g., with piles, soil nails, tieback anchors), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 91 employers in Benicia, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Charleroi Locks & Dam 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR So. Cal. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Railroad/Posillico JV LLC 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Technology Construction, Inc. 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schreiner Farms 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE FIVE POINTS T.I.C. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE OFFICE 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brocchini Farms Inc. 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 484 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 111 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bio-Rad Laboratories Benicia Campus 649 FTE
CITY-NEAR Underground Construction - Main 625 FTE
NAT-TCR Indian River Transport 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR University Loft 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Smith Masonry Inc 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR H.R. Ewell, Inc.--Cocoa, FL Terminal 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 013 Grand Prairie, TX 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charlotte Hangar 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charlotte Wilmar 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Distribution Centers LLC-101 Ventura Drive 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.