Warehouse · Michigan

DCM : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI

Highland Park, MI · ~39 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DCM : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Warehouse workplace, earning a grade A.

DCM : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI: 1.4 TCR = 24% of Warehouse BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DCM : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI safety composite

DCM : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2022→2023

DCM : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI injury rate improved

DCM : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI's TCR fell 2.8 from 2.8 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.8 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Highland Park, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #35/194
  • PHOTO Warehouse Services, …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Warehouse Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

DCM : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DCM : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI averages 1.4 TCR (24% of the Warehouse BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

DCM : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI TCR series: 2022=2.8 · 2023=0 · BLS 5.8

Where DCM : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI falls in its industry

9,477 Warehouse establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 194 Warehouse employers in Michigan.

DCM : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI (39 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate DCM : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI
DCM : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI (39 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

DCM : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI has fewer employees than the Warehouse median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · MI · Highland Park

9,477 Warehouse employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 26 employers in Highland Park, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Warehouse Services, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Bernardino - 701 South Arrowhead Avenue 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Landsberg San Jose 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1911-19110006-003013 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Overhead Door Co of Grand Rapids Acquisition LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Calhoun Foundry 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE AB Spring Service, Inc. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE GOGEBIC COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Lakes Wine and Spirits 1,368 FTE
CITY-NEAR Modular Automotive Systems Highland Park 965 FTE
CITY-NEAR Magna Seating Detroit 903 FTE
CITY-NEAR John E. Green Company 760 FTE
NAT-TCR Border States Electric - Amarillo 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #5310 Fayetteville, NC 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hot Line Construction Porterville 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ATR Lighting Enterprises Inc - Missouri 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 5436 - Cyfair 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mastria Subaru 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Border States Electric - Albuquerque 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lindenhurst 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.