Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge · District of Columbia

Fort Myer Construction Corporation

Washington, DC · ~933 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fort Myer Construction Corporation runs at 154% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge workplace, earning a grade D.

Fort Myer Construction Corporation: 4.3 TCR = 154% of Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fort Myer Construction Corporation safety composite

Fort Myer Construction Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2020→2023

Fort Myer Construction Corporation injury rate improved

Fort Myer Construction Corporation's TCR fell 1.0 from 5.3 in 2020 to 4.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=5.3 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Washington, DC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 154% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK P35
  • PHOTO Schmidt Construction…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 147 inj
  • SIZE ~933 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Schmidt Construction Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · District of Columbia employers → · Look up another →

Fort Myer Construction Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fort Myer Construction Corporation averages 4.3 TCR (154% of the Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fort Myer Construction Corporation TCR series: 2020=5.3 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=4.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Fort Myer Construction Corporation falls in its industry

4,078 Construction management, highw establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Fort Myer Construction Corporation (933 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Fort Myer Construction Corporation
Fort Myer Construction Corporation (933 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Fort Myer Construction Corporation has more employees than the Construction management, highway, road, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.3 3.5 40 0 0
2022 3.5 2.8 27 0 0
2021 4.2 3.4 30 2 0
2020 5.3 4.4 50 4 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · DC · Washington

4,078 Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 793 rated employers in District of Columbia with headcount on file · 748 employers in Washington, DC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Schmidt Construction Office 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR O.C. Jones & Sons, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Paving Co. 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pikes Creek Site Contractors 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE DC - HQ 983 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACC 2150 PENN 883 FTE
STATE-SIZE MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital 816 FTE
STATE-SIZE FMCC 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's National Medical Center 7,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Washington Hospital Center 7,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Georgetown University Hospital 4,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Customs and Border Protection - Headquarters 3,601 FTE
NAT-TCR Kee Safety, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sack-Wern 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR YFS Transitional Housing and Youth Development 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Military Affairs - 148th FW - Fire Dept 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Swisher International 933 FTE
NAT-SIZE ATLCGAMVH01 933 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Minneapolis Police Dept. 933 FTE
NAT-SIZE NMC Health 933 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.