commercial and industrial machinery and equipment (except automotive and electronic) repair and maintenance · Tennessee
Geodis MHR CL Overhead
Nashville, TN · ~52 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- D
- Poor Safety Record
- 3.0
- Avg TCR
- 2.1
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Geodis MHR CL Overhead runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical commercial and industrial machinery and equipment (except automotive and electronic) repair and maintenance workplace, earning a grade D.
- D
- Poor Safety Record
- 3.0
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 2.1
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 3
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Geodis MHR CL Overhead's OSHA Total Case Rate of 3.0 to the commercial and industrial machinery and equipment (except automotive and electronic) repair and maintenance BLS benchmark of 2.1 (143% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Geodis MHR CL Overhead's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 2.1 industry benchmark.
Where Geodis MHR CL Overhead falls in its industry
3,014 commercial and industrial mach establishmentsSafer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.
Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 73 commercial and industrial mach employers in Tennessee.
Trend analysis for Geodis MHR CL Overhead
Between 2016 and 2017, Geodis MHR CL Overhead's Total Case Rate improved from 6.0 to 0.0 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 100% decrease across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2017, at a TCR of 0.0, while 2016 saw the highest rate, at 6.0, a spread of 6.0 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, Geodis MHR CL Overhead recorded 3 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 3 injuries shown on this page for Geodis MHR CL Overhead are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 811310 - commercial and industrial machinery and equipment (except automotive and electronic) repair and maintenance.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2017)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 107,100 hours worked = 0.00 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Geodis MHR CL Overhead (this establishment) | 3.00 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial industry avg | 2.10 | BLS IIF, NAICS 811310 |
| Tennessee state avg (all industries) | 4.09 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Geodis MHR CL Overhead to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2017: 0 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 3 reportable incidents · 3 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Geodis MHR CL Overhead's reported OSHA injury record versus its commercial and industrial machinery and equipment (except automotive and electronic) repair and maintenance peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 143% of the commercial and industrial machinery and equipment (except automotive and electronic) repair and maintenance benchmark, Geodis MHR CL Overhead reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider commercial and industrial machinery and equipment (except automotive and electronic) repair and maintenance sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Geodis MHR CL Overhead's safety grade?
How many injuries has Geodis MHR CL Overhead reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Tennessee, and by nearby establishments in Nashville - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~3.0)
Similar size (~52 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.